You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

This is a case of you failing to communicate though. Not bad faith actors or whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

It makes perfect sense.

“It’s literally rocks…” Whats just rocks? Stonehenge!

“You’re valuing human life less than rocks, I think that says more about you than them.”

What are the protestors protesting for? Climate change.

Ie. If vandalizing Stonehenge is a bigger issue to you than climate change then you’re valuing human life less than rocks.

It could not be any more clear and I think that’s pretty evident based on the lack of offering a better wording.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It sounded like you are comparing the stonehenge protest to the one with the planes, not with climate change. Safety is critical in aviation, so it might sound dangerous to people that the planes were painted. I would instead say something like “they are valuing literal rocks over the lives of people claimed by climate disasters”. Then it’s clear you are talking about climate change in the second instance, and not the people flying the plane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How? Are planes just rocks? Are people?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 31K

    Comments

Community moderators