You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Good walkthrough. I think a lawyer would happily take the case on contingency to get a cut of a big easy settlement, but other than that everything you wrote sounds likely

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The contract lacks consideration and would not be found valid. No contract, no damages, no contingency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not a lawyer at all, but i just googled the definition of “consideration” and i don’t see how it applies here. This is a statement of how his property should be bequeathed after his death. People don’t will their properties to people in exchange for benefit before they die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Consideration means both sides need to give something in order for a contact to be formed. Asking “can I have x”, and the other side saying “yes” is not a contract because there is no consideration. This is day 1 law school Contracts stuff.

A will requires a document and cannot be formed orally except in very specific circumstances that do not apply here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 902

    Posts

  • 39K

    Comments