…And if it weren’t for that one joke by Hannibal, Bill Cosby would be very uncontroversial.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points
*

“wikipediocracy”? fucking seriously?

for all the good and bad bits that wikipedia has (and there are notably many of the latter too), a rulership is definitely not among that list afaik. wtf.

(e: I’m going purely off the domain name there, but holy shit what a name)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

literally started by a guy who was banned for trying to set up a business to write wikipedia articles, and the evils of JIMMY WAAAAAAAAALES!!! still fill his spleen

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

aaaaand then I actually looked at the page. fuck me it’s even worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

@froztbyte @sneerclub Well, if the vast majority of people in a community share a consensus reality and basic principles, you don’t need a formal governance structure to oppress hallucinating sociopaths.

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 179

    Monthly active users

  • 177

    Posts

  • 2K

    Comments