You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

Some 100 times+ compression, very fast and also at very low power (because it was inside the brain), and lossless.

And not stated but because it was inside the brain, I assume possible memory usage also wasn’t that high etc. Sorry have no direct link to the specs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@Soyweiser @V0ldek

The multi-electrode systems at the lab I worked in 2009 used a fiber connection to the host PC and generated terabytes of data, for just 128 or 92 electrodes (I forget) at not-all-that-many samples per second.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Sorry what is the point here? Or do you just want to share a cool story about data transfer? (I’m not trying to be snarky, I feel like im missing something here).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@Soyweiser

Just an example of the data involved in a brain-computer interface.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I assume possible memory usage also wasn’t that high

ye iirc we can remember like 7 things so that might be hard /s

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 179

    Monthly active users

  • 177

    Posts

  • 2K

    Comments