You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points

Using Lemmy without donating to the developers does not send support to them. Same goes for Ladybird, does it not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Adding to popularity does support them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, it EMOTIONALLY supports them. Dude. It’s okay. It also supports the users who get value out of it in actual material ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

A. Not a “dude”

B. I’ll pose the same rhetorical as I did to the other person that didn’t think popularity was support:

If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I guess that’s true when you’re a company trying to sell a product. For an open source project more popularity might just mean more hassle. Sure, it may increase your employment opportunities somewhat, but seeing how entitled and demanding users of os-software can be, I’m sure some devs wish their projects were less popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

you’re kidding, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Free and Open Source Software

!foss@beehaw.org

Create post

If it’s free and open source and it’s also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 795

    Monthly active users

  • 809

    Posts

  • 9.9K

    Comments