You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point
*

I can’t think of a single reason to use bash over Python. Anything you can do in bash can be done in pure Python. Unless you’re working in some embedded environment it’s a non-issue to install a Python interpreter (you certainly already have one). I would only use sh/bash for packages I’m distributing to avoid the external dependency, and then only if it’s a relatively simple script.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I know whatever environment I run my shell script in has sh, I can’t rely on (the right version of) python being there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Why not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because you could be on another machine that doesn’t have Python 3.X it only has 3.X-1. or you could write code for Python 3.12 and then four years later no one has 3.12 anymore.

Sometimes you need to download packages from pip but pip might not be available or you may be hitting your company’s internal pip mirror.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Bash is much better for doing file operations and piping the output across multiple commands

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Better than subprocess.getoutput?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

i would not run a python script with root.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s fair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

i run my daily NAS backup python script with root.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is fine, just should be more careful with modules used.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Why is always about bash? POSIX shell scripts run everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

BASH has some useful features and I’ve literally never had an environment with bash unavailable (even if a package is needed, so what).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

MacOS ships only 3.something version, which has some compatibility issues with Bash 4+.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Granted, it’s a kind of niche use case but in the embedded world there’s usually size constraints which prevents a full blown bash installation.

However, things are better now than 20 years ago. Flash is cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Python is superior for string anything (parsing, searching, manipulating). But Bash is much simpler for running existing CLI tools. Plus you should already be using Bash as a simple terminal language already, so wrapping what you’re used to into a simple script flows naturally.

Eg, if I have some admin tool for updating a user thingamajig, a common scripting need is just running that tool for every user in a file (or the output of another command). The string manipulation that often requires is annoying in bash, but running the commands is easier than Python.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If what you’re doing is essentially a few shell commands, then you may as well put it into a script. If you’re talking about how “elegant” your shell scripts are and comparing them to Python, you’re probably wrong and should be using Python.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmer_humor@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments