This is part 1 of an ongoing investigative series.

An algorithm, not a doctor, predicted a rapid recovery for Frances Walter, an 85-year-old Wisconsin woman with a shattered left shoulder and an allergy to pain medicine. In 16.6 days, it estimated, she would be ready to leave her nursing home.

On the 17th day, her Medicare Advantage insurer, Security Health Plan, followed the algorithm and cut off payment for her care, concluding she was ready to return to the apartment where she lived alone. Meanwhile, medical notes in June 2019 showed Walter’s pain was maxing out the scales and that she could not dress herself, go to the bathroom, or even push a walker without help.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

At this point I wouldn’t be surprised to see people calling something as basic as a bash script that adds 2 numbers AI due to lack of actual understanding of what AI is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I legitimately had someone pitch an idea for an AI that could’ve just been a 15min bash adventure lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

there are rice cookers and other appliances that advertise ai features with no explanation, and when you take them apart they are literally the same as the standard version.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The sad part is that they’re probably more expensive than the standard version, but marketing teams are using the AI hype bubble to trick ignorant consumers to believe that the AI appliance that has no differences is somehow better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Some weigh the clothes and adjust the wash time or prolong the centrifuge cycle if the clothes are still too wet (not sure if this is using the scale or the water flow)…BOOM comes with AI now :D at this point we need certification labels to end this bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Excellent Reads

!longreads@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.

Community stats

  • 117

    Monthly active users

  • 234

    Posts

  • 670

    Comments