You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point
*

Didn’t he violate Wikipedias rules though

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

hey buddy, uh, you gonna post any sneers in this here SneerClub thread you’ve started?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

it’s a highly sneerable article, i’m sure he has something to sneer about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

previously, presently (this thread). also:

I regret to inform you that Trace is hate-reading awful.systems

I lack any concrete evidence, but wouldn’t it just be fucking hilarious

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

still hasn’t really posted any sneers :<

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Show me a long-time English Wikipedia editor who hasn’t broken the rules. Since WP is editable text and most of us have permission to alter most pages, rule violations aren’t set in stone and don’t have to be punished harshly; often, it’s good enough to be told that what you did was wrong and that your edits will be reverted.

NSFW: When you bring this sort of argument to the table, you’re making it obvious that you’ve never been a Wikipedian. That’s not a bad thing, but it does mean that you’re going to get talked down to; even if your question was in good faith, you could have answered it yourself by lurking amongst the culture being critiqued.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

wut

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 179

    Monthly active users

  • 177

    Posts

  • 2K

    Comments