You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
19 points

Also it’s interesting that NDT orients his EM spectrum by wavelength rather than frequency, such that “above red” and “below UV” falls outside the visible range. Is ascending wavelength the convention in astrophysics?

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I imagine that he is equating the spectrum back to the rainbow, where red is the ‘top’ of the visible arch when a single rainbow is seen from the ground.

Of course the outer ring from a double rainbow flips the order of the colours, but that’s probably being needlessly pedantic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Oh shit, I hadn’t thought of that! That would be more accessible to the uninitiated, which is his thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Not normally. In physics the general convention is to use photon energy. This puts Radio and IR ‘below’ red, and UV ‘above’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That makes sense. Might’ve just been an accidental swap. Tweets aren’t peer reviewed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 8.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 859

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments