I’ve seen that some instances have already done it preemptively.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
33 points
*

They want to avoid Meta from repeating history:

Embrace, Extend and Extinguish

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m aware of that concept, but I’m having a hard time understanding how that applies to the Fediverse. It seems like we have an inherent protection from that tactic, even if we disregard defederation as an option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You know how Apple has extended SMS with iMessage? Like that.

In other words, they take something open and established like activitypub, and then build all sorts of cool features on top of it, but those features impose lock-in.

Eg. Maybe they make it so there’s some way of attaching media directly to posts, but only if the post is both posted and viewed from a Meta instance. And then, in a few years once they’ve become dominant due to everyone switching over to their platform out of fomo of those features, they break compatibility with activitypub and ruin the underlying structure of the fediverse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wouldn’t that just mean Facebook splits away from the fediverse into their own thing? The rest of the fediverse that don’t want anything to do with them would still keep existing just like it does now?

To be honest I really don’t mind if the users that want to use Facebook leave Lemmy and go to Threads. That just means that there’s less people here but the ones that stay have values closer to mine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Here’s an article that explains how it can still happen with decentralized platforms

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That actually doesn’t seem to give any context of HOW it could work for the Fediverse. All I see is “we are certain to lose”, but doesn’t go into what sort of mechanisms or tactics could be implemented to do a takeover.

Am I missing something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Which is irrational. Threads already has five times more users than the fediverse. There’s literally no reason for them to waste time trying to harm ActivityPub. Personally, I won’t be surprised if they shelf and ultimately cancel their plans to implement ActivityPub because there’s literally no reason for them to waste them time, especially when everyone in the community is throwing shade at them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

!main@lemmy.ca

Create post

Welcome to lemmy.ca’s c/main!

Since everyone on lemmy.ca gets subscribed here, this is the place to chat about the goings on at lemmy.ca, support-type items, suggestions, etc.

Announcements can be found at https://lemmy.ca/c/meta

For support related to this instance, use https://lemmy.ca/c/lemmy_ca_support

Community stats

  • 135

    Monthly active users

  • 187

    Posts

  • 2.2K

    Comments