You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
104 points
*

Bernie had this right. Despite being pretty progressive, he wasn’t for outlawing semiautomatic firearms because they were black and looked scary. He believed that the right to arms was justified. This “AR Ban” is a great way to lose a lot of independents, and even some hard D voters like myself. There are a lot of dems who carry, and a lot of them who own the very firearms he wants to ban.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I had a friend that said he only voted for Trump in 2016 cause he felt like he needed somebody to protect his rights to own a gun. This guy that “protected” host rights to own a fun also did massive amounts of damage to other people rights.

I wish Dems would quit talking about guns. It’s a mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What do you need an ar for ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Actually that is a good question. You don’t need an AR-15 because there are non-AR semi-automatic rifles that will do exactly the same thing but aren’t viewed as bad-ass. (BTW, auto-loading rifles have been around since 1883.) The AR-15 is a civilian semi-automatic and the basis of the M-16, so larpers can fulfill their G.I. Joe fantasies and a cuddle them when they are told to fear something by Fox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The AR platform is also just useful in general, which is why it’s become so popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Need? I don’t but I wanted one so here we are. AR ban is stupid will only help conservatives in the election. I’m not against gun control legislation that will actually do good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

So when shit hits the fan I can “borrow” 5.56 ammo from the military.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s quite a gun fantasy you have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Fighting fascists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Why do you need the freedom of speech to write this comment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Have you ever fired one before? They are way more accurate than a handgun. You could be 5ft away from someone with a handgun and still miss (especially in a high adrenaline situation). It’s considerably more difficult to miss with an AR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The AR isnt the only rifle that exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The AR isnt special. So why are they going after ARs specifically?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

As an independent, I could care less about this sort of thing. I see it as virtue signaling to staunch democrats. It won’t win him a single vote, since his entire platform has always been about being a super traditional Democrat.

We need new traditions, not rehashing of old, tired trades against things like specific types of guns and obesity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The next would be assasin will be forced to use a weapon appropriate for distance killing. They would be more likely to succeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The failed Trump shooter used a rifle completely appropriate for the distance. He was just a “comically bad” shooter, according to acquaintances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He wasn’t against outlawing them because they looked scary implies that he was in favor of outlawing them because they looked scary.

I think you mean he was against outlawing them because they looked scary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If you didn’t reply within 14 seconds of me correcting my post, yeah. That’s what I corrected it to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

ANSWER FOR YOUR 14 SECOND CRIMES

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He’s not gonna do shit, he’s just gonna continue to bark at one of the symptoms of the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

this right here folks. its a wedge issue and it doesnt solve the real problems

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Gun nuts are shit no matter what political label they have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How do you figure?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The magic of pure ignorance, I am guessing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Anyone who makes an object, guns, cars, pcs, weed, media they are fans of, etc. a significant aspect of their person, just means there wasn’t much person there to begin with. It is possible for something to be important to you, something you do for fun, something you enjoy, and not be your personality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments