WE DEMAND A CORRECTION TO uh various minor nitpicks

also we swear we totally didn’t get your email

bonus from thread:

I am having a lot of fun on Manifold, but if the team insists on inviting eugenics speakers to conferences, its probably time for me to leave :-/

What exactly is your objection to people exercising their bodily autonomy to implement voluntary eugenics?

0 points

lesswrong response

first comment:

The response from Habryka points out several factual inaccuracies, but I don’t see anything that directly refutes the core issue the article brings up. I recognize that engaging with the substance of the allegations might be awkward and difficult, not constituting “winning” in the rationalist sense.

dutifully downvoted to -6 of course

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

One problem with discussing this is that we here arguably have an asymmetric discourse situation.

"I’d like to tell you my thoughts on these various eugenicists, but they would be repulsive, fedposts, impossible to convey accurately in public discourse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The good news is that eugenics chuds are really easy to simulate.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

so sorry that you have to soil your diodes with these shitheads’ tamagotchis

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

With just a little bit of creative bin-packing they can share a core with the processes that simulate the smell of sewage and leafblower noise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The Good Place is a perfect model for this. For the price of a single simulated clam chowder fountain, you can torture hundreds of souls in parallel!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Imagine being such losers that you get owned by the fucking Guardian, and as your brilliant followup, you start screaming “I’M NOT OWNED”

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Has anyone checked for kernels of corn growing behind their ears?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

idgi

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

the corncob of ownage

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Dang that slanderous Guardian describing Manifund as a prediction market when it’s a market where people make predictions. Totally misleading!

Since Ivan owns 50% of the project’s certs, his stake has tripled in value from $3,000 to $9,000; he sells them for $9,000 to The Good Foundation, netting a $6,000 profit. (Important note: for legal reasons, profits on Manifund impact certificates can currently only be used to donate to charity and can’t be cashed out in the normal way.)

permalink
report
reply
0 points

is it considered acceptable journalistic ethics at Vox for a journalist who reports on EAs and prediction markets to make prediction market bets on how a journalistic outlet will follow-up a story on prediction markets and EAs? My eyebrows have just levitated so high they’ve collided with a starlink swarm.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

yes, she’s ingroup

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But betting? There’s being an insider and then there’s profiting, and aren’t most journalists prohibited from trading or betting on their covered areas?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Isn’t it like not real money? Or have they changed that

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

but money is The Unit Of Caring

yes, she literally nicknamed herself “money”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Aren’t prediction markets an attempt to turn insider trading into a productive part of society (or whatever the libertarians who love prediction markets conceptualize as society.)

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 305

    Monthly active users

  • 160

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments