Comcast and other ISPs asked FCC to ditch listing-every-fee rule. FCC says “no.”

2 points

Glad I cut the cable for good this time.

I just use Visible for Internet and spend $25/month.

Nice seeing an extra $600 in my bank account after a year of no cable internet.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Federal Communications Commission yesterday rejected requests to eliminate an upcoming requirement that Internet service providers list all of their monthly fees.

In June, Comcast told the FCC that the listing-every-fee rule “impose[s] significant administrative burdens and unnecessary complexity in complying with the broadband label requirements.”

The five trade groups kept up the pressure earlier this month in a meeting with FCC officials and in a filing that complained that listing every fee is too hard.

They complained that the rule will force them “to display the pass-through of fees imposed by federal, state, or local government agencies on the consumer broadband label.”

That would give potential customers a clearer idea of how much they have to pay each month and save ISPs the trouble of listing every charge that they currently choose to break out separately.

The FCC rules aren’t in force yet because they are subject to a federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review under the US Paperwork Reduction Act.


The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

It’s like a grade school teacher asking students to show the work.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Why isn’t the Internet seen as a utility, yet?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Won’t ever be because we’re in the stage where everything is marketed as much as possible.it would take a massive cultural and political shift to change that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nah. It will happen. It happened with electricity, the telegram and advanced education; it will happen to the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes. Just not for a very long time.

The cultural shift will occur, and future generations will be laughing at us for not having it sooner.

Like, why support paying private businesses taxpayer money? The same work still needs to get done, only now there’s a small group of owners profiting from the excess funds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
2 points

That is a strong argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Because this generation of Americans has been indoctrinated to believe all government owned businesses is a bad thing.

It’s better to funnel taxpayer money to private corporations that routinely fail to deliver quality products while the owners rake in the profits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And that government owned businesses have to be profitable. And even when they are (USPS) there are still calls for cutting costs…

Because surely spending another few hundreds of millions of taxpayer money on the army and “just one more lane” is far more effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, everything except the military because it funnels money to corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Access to the internet shouldn’t be gatekept for profit.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments