cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/1842280

Talking to the Happy Sad Confused podcast, the John Wick director suggested his approach to the new film in development will be to launch a potential series of films. He says the idea is to not rush the first movie to the original film’s conclusion — which crowned MacLeod the sole survivor of a group of dueling immortals following their climactic Gathering.

“I think we have some very good elements now,” he said. “The trick is when you have the tagline, ‘There can only be one,’ you can’t just kill everybody the first time.”

Stahelski also said the film will incorporate elements of the 1992 syndicated Highlander TV series, which ran for six seasons.

“Our story engages a lot of the same characters, but we’ve also brought in elements of all the TV shows,” Stahelski said. “We’re trying to do a bit of a prequel — a setup to The Gathering — so we have room to grow the property.”

He noted he hasn’t thought of John Wick as a franchise (despite that Continental TV show coming) but he does see Highlander as a potential franchise.

“We have ideas for days for the coolest characters [that could make for] an epic TV show,” he said. “I just think that’s rich mythology when you can pick any period of time, any nationality, any culture, any type of person and make them an immortal that have to duel and deal with the burden of immortality — that’s fucking cool.”

-19 points

I am so sick of Cavil and reboots.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

dude was great in witcher, never played the games, knew nothing, but he was captivating, and sold the show for me, until this last season when the producers killed it dead with boredom

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Speaking for myself: Cavill keeps getting caught in projects he’s passionate about, but whose producers/creatives don’t honor the writing (Witcher) or characterization (Superman) of their respected properties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What was wrong with Superman’s characterization in Man of Steel?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’d say it’s less Cavill specifically and more the entire mood of a “Superman” story. Superman is basically entirely about the hopeful motivation of the human spirit. He’s an avatar for humanity though he’s not even human. He’s the best of us without even being one of us. To me it can be boiled down to one moment, the moment where Jonathan Kent talked his own son out of being the best he could be in favor of selfishly keeping a secret.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I would prefer Cavil do something unique. Like how Keanu did with John Wick.

How about something cyberpunk? Where every one is mostly using guns and he’s they guy running around with a sword

permalink
report
reply

And it’s like he’s playing the sub 3 int character in one of the two original Fallout games. Dumb as shit, but fuckinf strong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Highlander? Rebooting Highlander…

My wife gets furious over reboots. Like hellfire, brimstone, the fucking works. She went full postal over 21 jump street, and afaik has never actually seen it, or the sequel.

I’m generally kinda “whatever” with it. Most of them could simply have a different title and stand on their own, and the titling just seems kinda “fuck it were out of ideas” lazy, making it odd, because you took the old title out of laziness, then made a whole ass new movie? Weird… that’s weird man.

We might switch out on this one though. You can’t do this with Highlander. The old Highlander movie is gonna show up and chop its fucking head off because THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE.

(Yeah… this whole ass comment was a dad joke… Dgaf)

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just tell her they are only rebooting the 2nd movie. It will be a direct sequel with survivors from their alien home world finding earth and attempting to terraform it after the events in the 2nd movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

She went full postal over 21 jump street, and afaik has never actually seen it, or the sequel.

That is a real damn shame because both films are fantastic. Of course, they are the exception rather than the rule. Phil Lord and Christopher Miller basically specialize in turning bad ideas into gold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Why not reboot though. Its one of those things I don’t think really I want to go away. It saves so much time. I already know the story and characters. I don’t need 6 seasons and 2 films to build the mythos. Its all built into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Except all reboots waste time retelling the very beginning of a characters development because they are banking on starting a franchise.

How many reboots are stories about the lead up to the character becoming the character? This sounds like we won’t even get to the “there can only be one” finale before the franchise is cancelled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Could be straightforward enough. Just start with his death and then he wakes up. Mild confusion, but Conner finds him quick enough to explain the basics, your immortal now, there can be only one, we’ve done this before but something new fucked it up.

He can either be the new Sean Connery as a mentor, or have him get instakilled by our big bad.

We can see Carvell deal with his old life (perhaps someone had him killed, aka mafia?) and the new immortal world he got sucked into.

… Or maybe I just wrote it the way you said sucks, I’m not sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yea that’s a waste. But not all. James bond is a good example. You just start the story and go

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ahem, every reboot of a Batman or Spider-Man movie starts with another origin, except maybe the Pattinson Batman, I can’t remember

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Battinson didn’t really do an origin. He’s a younger Batman, and they touch somewhat on his parents’ death, but they don’t like…re-enact the run-up to him becoming Batman. He’s just Batman.

FWIW I rather liked The Batman. I liked the more noire-detective element that often seems to be missing from Batman movies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It could work. Reset Raiden (er, Christopher Lambert) in Sean Connery’s role. Introduce known and new immortals while slow feeding a build up to the Quickening. Just try to avoid any of what happened with 2. Just, no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hold on a sec, you don’t want them to use any of the Highlander 2 revolutionary ideas?

/s

Seriously though, trying to reboot Highlander might actually work. It’s a known property, but really only the first movie had any value (and some of the TV series) and it’s not that well known from younger generations. It’s also not such a classic that you cannot touch it without people screaming (like, say, Ghostbusters)

Edit: grammar

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Reboot? So, I guess there will be two.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s just lucky they never made a sequel to Highlander.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Henry Cavill? I guess the first season will be amazing, after which they’ll replace him for caring too much about honouring the material.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Except this is going to be a film.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I’m just sick and fucking tired of reboots. I get it because it’s like an opportunity for millennials to share their childhood with Gen z and Gen alpha and so of course it’s going to make money because it’s running off that nostalgia bank but what the fuck are people going to be nostalgic about in 20 years from now?

I mean, they’re not getting any original material to build happy memories to, and 40 years from now all is going to happen is the last surviving millennials will be arguing with Gen beta how the third reboot of Spider-Man was the best one and they’re going to say no the 7th reboot is obviously the best one, you don’t even fucking know what you’re talking about old man

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Every time a studio comes up with a new idea and original movie, the fanboys shit on it and nobody sees it in theater. So original movies are a risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree, but it was such a great idea and an excellent movie. Too bad there were no sequels.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Movies

!movies@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW’s home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put “(Spoilers)” in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don’t want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don’t support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments