I think we should start a campaign to identify all the Economist writers. I mean some proper linguistic identification (if it’s not just A.i generated) and file leaking to find these ghouls.
I can’t stand that they’re just an anonymous propaganda blob.
The Economist, a journal that speaks for the British millionaires, is pursuing a very instructive line in relation to the war. Representatives of advanced capital in the oldest and richest capitalist country, are shedding tears over the war and incessantly voicing a wish for peace. Those Social-Democrats who, together with the opportunists and Kautsky, think that a socialist programme consists in the propaganda of peace, will find proof of their error if they read The Economist. Their programme is not socialist, but bourgeois-pacifist. Dreams of peace, without propaganda of revolutionary action, express only a horror of war, but have nothing in common with socialism.
oldest and richest capitalist country.
Netherlands is the oldest, and the US/Switzerland are the richest.
Guam, a tourist island and military outpost and literally nothing else.
America can’t even beat Russia in a war in Europe, how do they think they can beat China in the South China Sea?
