Pretty depressing reading.

[Edit] I had the archive link as a comment but this has gained enough traction that it’s not obvious. Here it is again so you don’t have to give FT any clicks https://archive.is/ypkln

18 points

Unsurprising that it all shot out of control after 2010, and just more evidence that we need to build more.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

This is something I’d wish the next government would do. Seriously how hard is it to build? Bust through the bullshit planning restrictions and build houses that people want to live in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The house building companies already have vast amounts of land they own with planning permission in place. They restrict the amount of housing they build to artificially keep the prices high, if they build too many, the prices they could sell their houses for would drop, reducing profit. These are private companies and the government has little control over them. This is why every government for the last few generations has promised more houses and delivered nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

It is unfortunate that the building companies make more money by not building, than by building.

We need a progressive land/council tax. Hording land should cost you.

My favourite suggestion should be that tax levels are based upon a heat map of urban density, but also linked to area owned. It was a suggestion that came out of the US because they have problems with land hording in urban areas, spaces that are just a car park to act as a holding for land.

It would mean that ownership of inner city, undeveloped land and also owning large estates is penalised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

These are private companies and the government has little control over them.

lol, they have an army, just send it in and nationalize the shit out of them. the government has as much control as it wants to have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The gvernment only makes this situation worse with the town and country planning act too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

It’s by design.

The rich want low housing and high population because it makes their assets go up. Traditionally like silent generation, greatest generation and before affordable homes for the working class and the following generations was seen as an ideal that people were willing to die for. This ideal was largely realised with the boomers.

But the boomers then decided it is better if they have houses and no one else does because their wealth can go up and they can then make money like the land owners than their grandparents were kept in poverty by. Now they can do it to their children!

I honestly don’t think it will be solved until the boomers die. Even then I wouldn’t count on it. Too much effort to keep population increasing no matter the cost.

If I was PM I would end up get voted out by doing something drastic like trying to put through a land value tax and building a new city 1mill+ city maybe between Hull and Leeds. Put a big fucking 200mph train line between Liverpool and Hull. Tell everyone to get fucked and steal some quotes from Churchill and JFK about going through hard time for the better of the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They simply don’t want to. Construction company owners are some of the richest and ones who do the most lobbying to MPs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why would they? They’re all landlords lol. More supply means dropping property values.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The next government. They are incentives to help younger generations and renters as these make up a large majority of their voters that helped them into power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Until we:

  • Ban buy-to-let mortgages.
  • Ban landlords from owning multiple houses.
  • Invest into social housing and ban so-called “affordable housing” lettings.

We’ll continue to be stuck in this downward spiral.

The problem is, everyone in power is a landlord or otherwise benefits from the current system, so nothing changes and we continue circling the drain as a society.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

agree with this and would add that the privatisation of social housing needs to be ended by abolishing the right to buy before real investment into it can begin

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

An above average number of MPs are landlords but they’re still a minority in the commons

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We need to build more because this is about a Shelter piece on people having to live as families in a single hotel room rotating locations.

We aren’t even at the point of private landlords being the problem and preventing people from buying, as there simply aren’t enough houses for people

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s both

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Paywall bypass link here:

https://archive.is/ypkln

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I live in the 272nd most deprived area (out of 317).

New 4 bedrooms houses on horrible estates cost £850,000 because Londoners have moved here and commute from the nearest station.

Build the houses, make them actually affordable and only sell them to people who live or work in the local area.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

surprised Canada isn’t ranked worse

permalink
report
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments