It’s in the eye of the beholder, of course. But it would be great to see some solid recommendations.

58 points

The distribution doesn’t to too much, its mostly the desktop environment. I like the look of KDE Plasma the most. But usually I craft my own look after a while.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

I like the look of KDE Plasma the most.

GNOME vs KDE gang fight has been summoned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The look of GNOME isn’t the problem of GNOME. ;-) I’m not a good citizen right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Absolutely. GNOME often looks better, but it just doesnt work. Basic things everywhere are removed or not added.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well GNOME has issues but in terms of look it’s 69420x better than KDE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Agreed. I think it’s not about distros we should have pay attention, but desktop environments.

And about “most appealing” DE I think it’s subjective. Surely KDE has the most flexible structure and may be exactly what you want, but Gnome is also appealing for some people (myself included).

Again, there is no right or wrong, just personal preferences

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You don’t need much to make something look fancy or modern. Even XFCE can look modern.

edit: made it less offensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good for you that you like your XFCE environment

I would like to see how your desktop is, if you don’t mind

However, again, it’s personal preference

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

☯️

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I took it as a question of which distro looks nicest out of the box (like, which distro manager has made real effort to make something particularly nice looking).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Somebody needs to tell me what they’re doing to Plasma to make them like it so much because when I install it with Breeze it just looks like Windows 2000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Windows 2000 looks nothing alike KDE Plasma with Breeze theme. But besides that point, you don’t have to like what others like. It’s just taste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t really care how it looks precisely, so long as its semi-professional and consistent in its style.

Like, I change the font to Fira Sans, because Noto Sans gives me depression, but the rest of my customizations are all just to carve out my ideal workflow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Windows 2000 looked amazing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

I don’t think it’s the distros job to look visually appealing. That’s the job of the desktop environment. Seriously I wish distributions would just ship vanilla desktop environments. All of the themed variants always have some issues. Maybe I’m just old and stubborn but that’s my opinion.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Fuckin same. It took so long for me to realize a lot of issues I had wasn’t because gnome was shit, it was because every distro fucks with gnome until it’s unusable. I finally tried fedora and now gnome is my favorite DE and I love the workflow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, distros should, at most, change the default accent color and some pannel icon, but no more than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Assuming that the default is good then yes. But some default DEs are ugly as sin, or just hard to use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I can’t think of any desktop environments that are ugly or hard to use out of the box

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Granted.

For a beginner, however, this is a difference that would take some explaining. As you said, some distros heavily theme the desktop environments (DE) before shipping, so in that sense the question is fair.

By extension, of course, I am with you, as with the right amount of work, any distro can run any DE and make it look any way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

Definitely OpenBSD’s default fvwm

permalink
report
reply
10 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

TempleOS received mostly “sympathetic” reviews.

😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Does OpenBSD really default to FVWM in 2024? Metal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes, and not even the modern fvwm3, due to licensing issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A blast of the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

You’re asking about the desktop environment and its default settings, which may or may not be the same on any given distro.

But I have a tie between Plasma and Cinnamon (mint’s DE). They both take only minor tweaking to get where I want them, and I can use them both out of the box with zero complaints.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Many distros customize the colour schemes and theming of their desktops. The out-of-the-box XFCE in EOS looks nothing at all like vanilla XFCE for example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Garuda Hyprland edition. All the neon-RGB styling of Garuda gamer on top of Hyprland’s smooth UI.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Upvoted. I forgot about this distro. I don’t like its neon style at all but it’s something different and pleasing for some people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s finally an opinionated distro I agree with. Of course you can get anything to look like anything but I just like how they picked a path and went so far down it to make their own unique out-of-the-box experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t like some of the other decisions in Garuda, but it’s become hard to get away from it when even regular non-technical people who see it are like “Whoa, what is all that” and you literally just finished installing it and didn’t even change the wallpaper. It’s a very different feeling from what I’m used to with Linux and I’m into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know why other distros don’t offer out-of-the-box rices like this. It’s just fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 8.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 175K

    Comments