This incident marks another friction point between Mexico and Texas due to Governor Abbott’s anti-immigrant policies.

On Thursday, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) accused the Texas National Guard of violating international law by shooting a Mexican man in the Rio Grande, the river shared by Mexico and the United States.

“It’s a violation of international law because you can’t shoot from the U.S. side to the other side of the river, which is already our territory,” he said.

The Mexican president referred to an incident that took place on Saturday on the bank of the Rio Grande in Ciudad Juarez, bordering the U.S. city of El Paso, where a National Guard member fired from U.S. territory into Mexico.

While it was initially mentioned that the victim was a migrant, local authorities identified the victim as Darwin Garcia, a 37-year-old man from Veracruz, who was on a dirt path used by runners and cyclists for exercise over 10 meters from the riverbed.

“Texas authorities argue that it was in defense of a migrant, that the injured person wanted to harm a migrant, and that’s why he fired into the air and then at the person,” said AMLO, announcing that the Mexican government has initiated an investigation into this incident.

On Wednesday, officials from the Mexican Consulate in El Paso met with representatives of the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS), expressing that the incident is “unacceptable” and voicing their concern about the impact on human rights and migrant safety.

“The injured person in Ciudad Juarez was fortunately discharged yesterday. However, there is an ongoing investigation, and the person who fired from the Texas Guard has been temporarily suspended from duty pending a full investigation,” AMLO stated.

This incident marks another friction point between Mexico and Texas due to Republican Governor Greg Abbott’s anti-immigrant policies.

On Aug. 3, AMLO labeled Abbott as “inhumane” following the deaths of two individuals in the Rio Grande, where Abbott had placed buoys and a wire fence to prevent migrant crossings.

The Mexican Foreign Affairs Ministry has sent three diplomatic notes to Washington to lodge complaints about the buoys, alleging that they violate migrants’ human rights and international water treaties.


117 points

So an injured migrant (how did he get injured?) was on the Mexican side of the border. Was approached by a guy on a motorcycle. And the Texas guard decided to shoot the guy? Because, according to the Texas Guard, e was trying to harm the migrant?

So… Obviously made up story to justify what is still an illegal act.

These guys have abandoned all pretense of adhering to the rule of law.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

been temporarily suspended from duty pending a full investigation

and the classic US way of “paid vacation for (attempted) murder”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The military isn’t the police. Dude will face punishment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah.

We hold soldiers to a much higher standard than cops.

Cops can shoot all their bullets at someone because the felt scared.

A soldier pretty much has to be under fire, and even then they’re not supposed to keep shooting till their out of bullets

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yeah just like all the rapists do, right?

Military justice is a joke, hidden from public eye.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No, wait, you don’t understand. The guys who signed up to round up and (possibly) kill migrants were trying to protect a guy in another country. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It is the National Guard, there are probably way more people there for GI Bill benefits than some political ideology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Just a reminder the republican platform is we should invade and bombs Mexico, that’s what they say we should do

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Which psycho politician had said this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

An act of war, you say.

I wonder why those Americans were shooting people in a river in the first place. That’s their solution to everything, shoot people. Got a problem? Shoot at it.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

If you’re so smart, how do you turn the light switch off after you get in bed without firing a shot?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

“Alexa, shoot the bedroom lights”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Cut on the lights

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why use lights? Muzzle flash is the new in for light sources in the US. It even saves on the electric bill!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
0 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/3I9_hlnkvew?si=f6koMt04OPZc4EgM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s worse than that. The shots were fired across the river into Mexican territory. The national guard should know their authority on that type of situation. This was a major fuck up and they are definitely being chewed out for the mountains of paperwork he just created. Stuff like this isn’t easily swept under the rug, especially if our southern neighbor pushes the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Hmm but we can’t apply that to the problem most of the country has with the Texas government, a weird double standard

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I guess that you are joking, and I disagree with their stupid policy, but it’s not really that weird for policies to be different in the border of a country with inter country borders. It’s not a double standard, they are clearly two well defined different standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It’s not on the border it was on the other side of the border, the guy with the gun was on the Texas side of the border

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

“Texas authorities argue that it was in defense of a migrant, that the injured person wanted to harm a migrant, and that’s why he fired into the air and then at the person,” said AMLO

Pretty sure that’s still illegal.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Only when the perpetrator isn’t Republican.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The US government doesn’t believe that international laws apply to them - and they’re kinda correct, nobody has a big enough military to really stand up to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Illegal yes, morally wrong, I would say no.

If(and it’s a big if) this is an accurate statement, then defending a presumably innocent person from harm should take higher priority than complying with jurisdictional boundaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In this case, it isn’t quite “defending”. With the distance involved, the chance of hitting your target and the risk of hitting someone else, it really is not something you should be doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We must invade Texas to restore the rules-based international order and to bring about freedom and democracy.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments