Key quotes:

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is working furiously behind the scenes to put pressure on President Biden to reconsider his place at the top of the 2024 ticket, according to a number of Democratic lawmakers familiar with her efforts.

The Speaker emerita is talking to a broad swath of House Democrats — from front-liners in tough districts to hardened veterans with institutional clout — to pump the brakes on the notion that Biden should definitively be the party’s nominee heading into November, these lawmakers said.

Pelosi has not said Biden should exit the race, but the lawmakers said she harbors deep concerns about Biden’s ability to defeat former President Trump, and she’s fighting to prevent the party from rubber-stamping Biden’s candidacy before there’s a broader discussion about the potentially damaging consequences of that decision.

Note: This is a “breaking” story, as in, its been leaked and is just now showing up on multiple outlets.

46 points
*

Would be AWFULLY convenient for trump if the Democratic party splinters rn

permalink
report
reply
56 points
*

Which is why, whatever happens, we’re voting Blue, and reminding everyone else who wants to not live (or die) under a fascist regime to do the same.

But Biden’s advantages of a proven track record, incumbency, and massive name recognition, simply may not outweigh the damage anymore. The perception of his decline is severe, and there may be some truth to it - it’s certainly not a reputation he’s going to shed in the next five months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Democrats will vote for a blue pet rock. The point is to get someone that independents will vote for. And if both candidates are a bunch of old cooters that keep mixing up names, they’ll stay home or vote third party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah. He needs to be replaced at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The perception of his decline is severe, and there may be some truth to it - it’s certainly not a reputation he’s going to shed in the next five months.

Which even if true, is just absurdist considering his opponent can’t even finish a sentence without switching to a new topic and turning a statement into word salad. 2024 is freaking cursed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

… yeah. We live in a kafkaesque nightmare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Look, Biden should fuck off, but I’ll vote D no matter what, and there’s a lot of people who share my inclinations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Agreed, but things might get ugly fast and that leaves an opening for trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Lets just all agree that if you plan to vote blue no matter who then you’re not the target audience.

If the Democrats want to generate enthusiasm for the election then all they have to do is start making promises that appeal to the undecideds.

It’s easy, just send Israel’s arms shipments and financial support to Ukraine instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Would be AWFULLY convenient for trump

Would also be convenient for him if the Dems stick with Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The Dem chance at a clean change from Biden to a younger option was last year, not 4 months prior, at least not with how the antiquated US election system works. Changing it now is fucking stupid, the table has been set. People are calling to flip the table because somehow they’re just now realizing that old people are old. This is what the Dem leadership has created, and regardless of their second guessing now it’s what we need to live with.

Just another in a long running series of stupid decisions by Dem leadership over the last 30 years, always shooting themselves in the foot and assuming people will still vote for them. With middling success every time, yet never learning anything because the same old fucks are still running it all somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

4 months should be enough time still, IMO

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It would be their own fault when it happens, The Biden we are seeing now is the Biden that they’ve known about for the last 4 years. Yet they still pushed him to run for reelection and sent their minions out to social media to claim anyone pointing out his problems are either Russian bots, paid by Putin, or Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Some more quotes:

“I did have a conversation with her, she is very concerned,” said a House Democratic lawmaker who spoke anonymously to discuss a sensitive topic. “It’s not like she’s like, ‘We’re sticking with this guy.'”

A number of other lawmakers have had similar discussions.

“I’ve had my own conversations with her,” a second Democrat said.

“It’s just an obvious concern. The stakes are so high. We can’t afford to do anything but have our best possible opportunity to win,” the lawmaker said, relaying Pelosi’s message.

Pelosi’s push for a deeper assessment of Biden’s candidacy, sources say, is rooted in concerns that the president’s campaign has responded to his disastrous June 27 debate performance with emotional appeals to staunch allies and a show of forceful defiance — but not an honest reckoning with underlying image problems or an objective analysis of the political fallout.

“Team Biden made it clear what their strategy was: ignore the problem, run out the clock, and force the rest of us to live with it,” said Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), who has publicly called on Biden to step aside. “I felt a certain urgency to upset that strategy.”

Like…

Wowza.

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

This would be so much better if the Biden campaign didn’t act like they were in denial.

If he’s so hell bent on being president… OK. But he needs to come out with Kamala Harris, and emphatically say “I’m old. I know it. And I’ll lean on my cabinet and my vice president, heavily, and do what we’ve been doing.” Not act like everything’s hunky dory when everyone knows it’s not.

Act like Harris is an equal! Put her front and center! They can have their cake and eat it if he just puts his pride aside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have a feeling there may still be bad blood there considering Harris basically acted like she was the one elected president early in Biden’s first term, until he reminded her who was president and who was vice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Pelosi the corporate democrat needs to step down and stop bowing down to the oppressors

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yeah she sucks but at least she’s sucking her way to maybe get Biden out

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You should just not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Eat the rich

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t believe any of this I hear. I think Biden made it clear he is running

permalink
report
reply
3 points

BIdens opinion is rapidly becoming irrelevant. We don’t live in a dictatorship. Biden isn’t even winning a majority of Democratic voters right now.

Democratic voters, 60% of them, want him to step down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

So who is going to step up? Is she negotiating with Gavin Newsholm or Buttiege, or someone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Okay but he said he is running I’m going to assume he is. Either way I’m voting the same way and see very little difference who the Dems throw up next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

This will be like Humphries in 68.

Remember how he won? Remember him at all? Don’t worry: Biden plays the Johnson role here, with Trump playing the Nixon.

Binary choice. Biden, or every other option destroys the country. Good luck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Thats a fantasy that is destroying our ability to stop Trump.

You are in a cult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This would explain her totally lukewarm and noncommittal response the other day…

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments