86 points
*

8-bit DRM-removal patcher program music plays

3 command prompt windows pop up in the background and quickly disappear.

“Fuck. What were those?”

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Shhhhhhh…

Just let your main HDD get encrypted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

The fact that the game hasn’t been fully released yet and they are including a DLC if you buy the premium version, is just asking me to pirate it.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

From what i’ve seen of the game, it’s not even worth the bandwidth to pirate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-38 points
*

There is nothing inherently wrong with DLC, and I’m tired of pretending that there is. If you think the base game is over-priced, then by all means complain about that - but if both the base game and the DLC are worth the price they’re asking for it, then there is no harm done (and some advantage) in having modular buying options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Sure, if the DLC isn’t cut content from the game. That’s the problem. If they have already developed the content, then it should be released with the rest of the game, for the price of the game. DLC, should it be developed at all, should be an expansion beyond the original scope of development funded by the excess profit from the game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

the worst fucking offender at this has to be Mass Effect, and this is coming from someone who deeply loves Mass Effect.

I don’t buy DLC on principle, I will buy a proper expansion but not a DLC, so when I started Mass Effect 3 I didn’t understand what the fuck was going on. I had to google it because the start of the game ties in with a DLC from the second game, what a crock of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If they have already developed the content, then it should be released with the rest of the game, for the price of the game.

Why? Genuine question. What does it matter to you as a consumer when the content was developed?

If the point you’re actually trying to make is “if the game is developed as a whole, but then content is carved out such that the base game then feels incomplete without it”, then this is already covered: a game which feels incomplete is inherently flawed, and so doesn’t justify the price of a full game. That’s my original point - most people are actually just pissed at inaccurate or unfair pricing, and DLC can enable that (but doesn’t have to), so they misdirect their anger to all DLC instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

I dont think you’re thinking about this right. Stuff like DLC has never been funded from profits of a specific game, that’s not how company finances work. They may decide to create an expansion or extension of a product they weren’t planning if a product does better than expected, but a lot of time, it’s too late by then and you’ve missed the wave to capitalize on the success. Most things like this are planned pretty early on based on the projected success. The base game and the DLC might even have separate budgets.

And all that to say, the DLC shouldn’t factor into your evaluation of a game at all. If you would like the amount of content in the game if the DLC never existed, then they added enough. You aren’t owed more content because of when they developed it, that’s absurd thinking. And if it for some reason got coded into law, it wouldn’t make anyone add more content to the base game, they’d just wait until after the game is released to start developing it. Which would make for a worse experience for both the company and consumer.

I agree with the person you replied to: if a game feels incomplete, then that’s the problem. I’m not going to pay for an incomplete game, regardless if it has DLC or not. But if a game is complete and I enjoy it, I’ll pay for DLC to get more experience from it and it doesn’t matter to me when the DLC is developed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Meanwhile, I’m just happy to see quality content on GamePass again.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Right? Looks like their Bethesda purchase was the best investment for new content. Starfield, Hi Fi Rush, the Quake II remaster (we don’t talk about Redfall).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You misspelled cash cow content

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Oh shit this is good news, I looked at it yesterday and it’s $120 here and instantly thought fuck that I’ll wait until it’s cracked

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

What kind of country are you in that a game cost $120!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Australia, they love price gouging us here. Just went and checked steam again, the premium version is $170…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How much is a decent middle class income in Australia? I’d say it’s about $45,000 per year in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just curious. It’s it because of tax/vat or just everything being expensive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah I have Game Pass so I was pretty keen to play the early access but when I found out it was $170, just to play 5 days earlier? No fucking thank you.

I’m spending that money on an SSD because my partner bought the deluxe version and running it on my computer is arse. My computer isn’t even that bad!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How much is game pass on Australia?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Probably a country where the dollars are worth a different amount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Metric dollars Vs imperial

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Eh. By the time I have hardware that can actually play Starfield, it’ll be a GoG giveaway.

permalink
report
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 259K

    Comments