In a significant data breach, hacktivist group NullBulge has infiltrated Disney’s internal Slack infrastructure, leaking 1.2TB of sensitive data. This breach, posted on the cybercrime platform Breach Forums on July 12, 2024, exposes many of Disney’s internal communications, compromising messages, files, code, and other proprietary information.

150 points

So we gonna finally accept that maybe all these cloud services aren’t that secure

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Internal slack infrastructure

Taking this part of the description at face value anyway, this sounds like the opposite of the cloud.

That being said, I still agree with the statement

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

I don’t think Slack has a self hosted version, and does not offer IP allow listing. There’s nothing preventing someone to go to https://disney.slack.com/. I think when they say “internal” they mean for internal employees, and not like a thing for fans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I think when Disney demands an internally-hosted version of your product, then the sales team tells engineering that they’ll provide one, and mark the price up accordingly. That kind of thing doesn’t appear on the external listing for everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

They do. You pay extra for it. You have to have apache or a web server configured for it, and a lot of space. Source: I configured one like 4 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Good. Based for Nullbulge that they have released the source for free. Their motive is to put pressure on Disney due to their wrongdoings against creative artists.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

What source?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t remember, but here is their website with a magnet link for the source: https://nullbulge.se/blog.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

😂my ad blocker does not like this website (is marked as malicious)

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

Huh, I looked through the website of the hacking team and they use slurs and talk about posting on 4chan, it’s not a great look for a group trying to get on the good side of creative peoples imo

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Plus in their blog post they mention that they haven’t read through most of the leaks themselves so they don’t even know what kind of info they might be posting about potentially unrelated people, in an attack on “AI” that won’t stop disney even a little bit. Like, I understand the desire to help creative people but I don’t see how this is doing that

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

If you’re a grey-hat/chaotic-good hacker intent on exposing corporate greed or whatever, with a cache like that, you’ve got a couple options…either release inmediately, or review the data to minimize collateral damage and release.

If the intent was to help people, and there was no driving force to release immediately, then they should’ve waited and reviewed the data.

I really worry if this is going to lead to my overly-ambitious infosec group putting the kibash on our unofficial/shadow-IT (fully internal) MatterMost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Review the data cost your time (which is work time, could be transfer into money).

So, better release it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-72 points

also while I am on my soap box, ai-bro and crypto-bro are gendered insults and we should do better

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

How do ai-bitch and crypto-cunt sound?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Some alternate suggestions might be nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Touch grass

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Would “crypto-twat” be more acceptable?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Bro is a gender neutral slang

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A lot of hacker groups originated on 4chan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

In a shocking move, the wage slaves found that their bosses know that they are severely underpaid.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

So many passwords will be in there. And cat photos.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Passwords and lotsa creds. I know an infra engineer who stores all of the keys to the projects he’s involved in his message to self Slack. When I asked him about it he told me ‘when I found out that the company billed my time 5x my salary to clients I stopped caring’ and I was like OK that’s fair ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Depends. Our engineering slack (Few thousand members) doesn’t contain secrets for a few reasons:

  1. Secret scanning
  2. We have a /secret bot that will take your secret, store it securely, and then present a GUI for each person with access to display that secret “for just that person”. And then after a set period of time it’s made inaccessible, and wiped from the infra.
  3. Training and knowledge transfer on secret security

This has been incredibly effective. Especially the secret bot.

Turns out that the problem with people sharing secrets is just a matter of convenience. If you make a secure way convenient then everyone tends to just use it by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“Secret Bot” sounds great!

Custom in-house or off the shelf?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And jokes about meatball Ron

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments