219 points

Republicans: Make themselves above the Law while Endangering US National Security. Also Republicans: Why are people trying to Assassinate us?

permalink
report
reply
58 points

Seems like they’re making a whole list of crimes Biden can get away with though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

No, it’s still illegal for Biden, it’s only legal when a Republican does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It wouldn’t shock me if SCOTUS calls take backsies if a Democrat ever gets back into office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Fascists rely on you being a decent person in indecent times. They’re counting on Biden not using the full extent of the powers the office of the President has been granted because it’s so far beyond the pale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nah in tiny print somewhere you’ll find it says only allowed to be done by republicans

permalink
report
parent
reply
189 points

In the immunity case, when all the other judges were writing opinions about that case, Clarence Thomas wrote an opinion about a totally different case, this one. He was signaling her to dismiss the case.

I’m so sick of these corrupt motherfuckers

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Holy fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Quite honestly, something like this has been pretty obviously coming from the get go. Cannon has consistently made no effort to hide the fact that she’s bought and paid for and was presiding over the case in bad faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
144 points
*

What a nonsense decision, it should be appealed at the very least

Edit a lot has happened so let’s bring some context to this: Hilary Clinton was derided as unfit for presidency because she had a secure server in her private space for emails, some of which were classified.

Meanwhile, Trump literally had boxes of classified documents in a bathroom. Republicans are duplicitous, hypocritical and should not be expected to operate on good faith.

Or if they’re not, then they should show some objectivity and apply the same standards everywhere. What a bunch of clowns

Edit2 said a wrong word

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Buttery males

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

some of which were classified.

But not properly marked as such per DOD regulations when sent to her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It will be appealed… assuming Trump doesn’t win and tear the justice department to shreds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
138 points

Are you fucking kidding? So special attorneys, which have been used by pretty much every administration and every congress since the position was created, are not valid now?

I’m not a law expert, but was the way she dismissed it make it so he can’t be charged again in either another jurisdiction or by the appropriate (in her mind) prosecution team?

permalink
report
reply
51 points

So special attorneys, which have been used by pretty much every administration and every congress since the position was created, are not valid now?

Yep. Good luck to the Trump administration trying to enforce anything between this an Chevron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Yep. Good luck to the Trump administration trying to enforce anything between this an Chevron.

That presumes the law means anything to them.

As this ruling shows, law means nothing to the Republican party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I am trying to keep “hopeful” that they’ll stick to their Project 2025 plans in the sense that they’ll try to do it through legal shenanigans and loopholes rather than just sending out the Gestapo and keeping everyone in their homes with machine guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sadly they’re all for deregulation so it’ll be a plus for them :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They just won’t bother with a special prosecutor. They’ll just arrest whoever they want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

was the way she dismissed it make it so he can’t be charged again in either another jurisdiction or by the appropriate (in her mind) prosecution team?

I don’t think so, it would have said dismissed with prejudice if so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

She might just be incompetent and didn’t do all the right steps when she threw the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Given her argument for dismissing it was that the DOJ was incompetent and didn’t use the right kind of prosecutor, that seems fitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Also not an expert, but I don’t think so.

The big threat of that would be a dismissal after a jury was sworn. At that point, jeopardy attached, so rebringing the case could be unconditional under the double jeopardy clause [0].

The virtually unappealable way to do this would be to wait until the prosecution finishes their case. At that point, the defense will file a routine motion for a directed verdict that judges routinely deny. The defense gets to do that again after presenting their case. In either case, the judge granting the motion is not apealable.

The judge could wait until after a verdict and issue a judgement not withstanding verdict, but that is appealable.

[0] Not always though. A mistrial from a hung Jury can always be retired. Other forms of mistrial may be retryable depending on the facts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yup, Trump is getting free from his worst case on a novel technicality.

BuT tHe lAw pRoTecTs Us aLL eQuaLlY111

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not even a technicality, it’s something completely made up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

America is just shouting out of every place: “Down with democracy, down with the constitutional rule of law! Hail to a fascist state!” And still the biggest discussion is about some fumbling and age.

An authoritarian dictatorship is so clearly in your furure if you guys don’t wake up and spend your energy fighting against THIS instead of one another.

The rest of the world is really relying on you not to fuck this up.

Please?

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Please know lots of us in this country have no desire for this either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If just everybody would get up and vote!

I just saw a post about Trump gaining and now leading in every swingstate.

Its the same with the shift to the right in Europe. There are just too many people uninterested in politics or not voting because they don’t like any of the candidates. These are the people who have to wake up and understand that democracy is at stake and that they are responsible for it, if they don’t vote! The extremists will ALL be out there voting so we can’t really allow ourselves to be indifferent.

Lets all just follow France as an example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Some of us are doing shit, while some of our peers are still huffing farts about the DNC in 2016

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The rest of the world is really relying on you not to fuck this up.

America: Hold my beer…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 510K

    Comments