129 points

One thing’s for sure: JD Vance will be shit on and thrown under the bus.

That’s The Turmp Guarantee!

permalink
report
reply
61 points

Will he reuse the last set of vice presidential gallows, or get his own?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Ooh. That’s dark.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Depends on how he transgresses the unwritten law

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Vance seems like the kind of sleaze that would throw Trump under the bus too. Honestly I think it’s gonna come down to who gets the opportunity first. Its like a sith master and apprentice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The rule of two

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dang yo

Accurate AF

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I didn’t really know anything about him until recently, but from what I’ve been reading, that’s spot on. He doesn’t have principles except whatever is expedient in the moment. He’s happy to fellate Trump now, but if there’s an opportunity to get more power for himself, he’s going to take it, regardless of Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh man please let it be soon. Let the two rip each other and the party apart trying to throw each other under the bus

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I’m waiting for the inevitable ‘I never even knew the guy’

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

JD Vance was just a covfefe boy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Trump said, “See ya later boy.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

We can only hope. I’m more wary of the torch being passed on to him. Trump has a limited shelf life, but Vance is young.

And before the wave of “Trump doesn’t share power”, I know. I’m not talking about what Trump intends, I’m talking about all of Trumps powerful allies who want continued influence after Trump.

Trump will try to neuter Vance, for sure. But I have my doubts that he can pull it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What makes trump “work” - the con - on all these moronic shitheads is something Vance does not and will never possess. They may mutate it into some more overt crypto-fascist money cult, but they’ll never get the batshit dialed in to the sweet spot they have at the moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The thing is they only need this level of fanatic obedience from their base to get IN. Once they are, and they’re able to warp the government to their vision, everything else will fall into place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hope Vance can be the one who finally beats Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply

Over/under on how long it takes Vance to flip to the prosecution in some as-yet unknown future case against Trump?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh I think he’s already got the fake-tooth-cyanide-capsule implanted. He can never turn, only die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Mike Pence is a milquetoast HIV enthusiast with the looks and personality of a Q-Tip but it didn’t deter the dimwits in 2016.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Conservative Christians / Evangelicals loved Pence. He was a big reason Trump was elected imo. I don’t think this new jabroni will help trump like pence did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s good news, I hope so. They just seem to turn a blind eye to everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The vocal components are loud but don’t let them speak for everyone. Pence was a special candidate. He had a legitimate following. Vance might be able to get the GOP vote but he’s not getting the Christian vote like Pence was able to represent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m not sure Trump needs that kind of supporting appeal this time around. He survived an assassination attempt - to his religious followers, that is divine providence.

I believe the new jabroni was chosen for entirely different reasons. There is a significant MAGA uprising going on in Silicon Valley, and Vance is well connected there. This is an inroad previously impassable for republicans…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Trump picked Pence to shore up the evangelical vote. Vance was chosen to shore up the Nazi vote. Easy peasey.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

https://vxtwitter.com/JDVance1/status/1511311385543815180 - Seriously look at this campaign ad.

And don’t believe his sob story about his mother, I looked into it… She was an RN who kept raiding the controlled substances cabinet, had nothing to do with “Mexicans forcing drugs on her”

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Hahaha wtf is this

Are you a racist? Do you hate mexicans?

“Then come join us in the GOP”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Basically, like… How the hell did anyone greenlight this? I’m starting to think Vance is the GOP’s biggest weakness right now. Ya know his name wasn’t always Vance, he actually changed it because he had trauma associated with his previous name due to parental abuse.

And yet he wants to ban transpeople from changing THEIR names…

Hypocrite

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I looked it up to see what his name originally was. I think he actually changed it twice, right?

James Donald Bowman

James David Hamel

James David Vance

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Right? I wish all Republican ads were this blatant, I wish they had been back in 2012… We’d never have been in this situation to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hahahaha the community notes.

JD Vance’s mother utilized her position as a nurse to steal prescribed medication from her patients, not because of undocumented immigrants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t even know what to say. It reminds me of the dumbass whitebread fascist version of Sally Struthers hawking “degrees” back in the 90s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So? Do YOU hate Mexicans? Don’t YOU like to have an easy scapegoat available when your mother raided the pharmacy again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Vance doesn’t win any demographic that was lagging for Trump. Anyone who likes Vance was already voting Trump. Strategically on that alone, he’s a wasted pick. (I’m not complaining, don’t worry)

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I heard somewhere he has connections to money that Trump needs for the campaign, so that might be what drove it.

It’s pretty clear Vance previously hated Trump. And it’s surprising Trump picked Vance after those comments, but when neither person has a moral compass to stick to, just like the rest of the party, overlooking those kinds of issues becomes much easier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If Trump wins Vance is gonna have him killed so he can assume power. Terrible mistake for Trump. Maybe even worse for the every day person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

LOL. In the abstract, it’s pretty funny. (In reality it would not be funny at all.) I can imagine right after the election, “So long, sucker.” <blam>

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No headline in the form of this one means shit about what will happen in reality. I don’t pay these any mind anymore.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments