123 points

She looks like Steven Tyler having an allergic reaction to shellfish.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

She looks like a sex doll with low air pressure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

She looks like an off-brand muppet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

She IS like a sex doll with low air pressure.

Ftfy

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Burn of all burns!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Jesus christ that melted barbie doll is fucking terrifying

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Seriously. I won’t be sleeping well tonight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Looks like trump jr found a woman who is as beautiful on the inside as the outside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Black hole sun music video vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Very few people remember the original version of that video.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Back when I wore an onion on my belt. It was the style at the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

She’s like a five-day-old blow-up doll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points
*

Lol. They buried the lede:

Guilfoyle discussed unverified Newsmax’s reporting that Biden would step aside without endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris as the nominee.

“Unverified”? Is that a polite word for “made up”? If Biden did step aside he would be Kamala’s biggest cheerleader.

Fucking vote

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I think it’d be hilarious in a dystopian way if he bowed out, endorsed her, and she nominated him as VP

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Then the an assignation attempt elevates him again to POTUS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They sure do, bud, they sure do

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

The rumor I’m hearing is that he doesn’t want to be accused of “kingmaking” and instead will call for a brokered convention rather than picking her directly.

Note, this is only a rumor.

The illusion of choice is going to be necessary because she won’t get the support otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, there’s a lot of reporting right now that tries to force others to do what they say. Like yesterday there was an article saying that Pelosi plans to publicly push Biden to step down. How would they know this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No no someone else made it up, they couldn’t verify.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

To my knowledge it’s only unverified because the people saying it are doing so on the condition of anonymity. The idea seems to be that they want to go into an open convention with Biden at most saying something like “I have the utmost faith in the delegates to pick the best candidate to be our nominee,” because if he’s too involved in the choice whoever ends up being the nominee will have that looming specter of the narrative of Biden’s cognitive decline haunting them. “How could he pick a good replacement when he doesn’t even know where he is?” and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The last half of your comment feels like a really big stretch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It seems like a bit of a stretch to me as well. But that seems to me to be the thought process of the people who are advocating for an open convention rather than Biden just endorsing Harris and letting her pick a new VP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

IMO, this is being pushed by media, but as soon it happens it is almost guaranteed that they will immediately switch to build rhetoric that democrat voters were cheated and the party just picked up their candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think I agree with that. The media, especially the more right leaning media will always find something to attack Democrats over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unverified to you means “verified by a source that prefers to remain anonymous”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Be skeptical of unverified and unverifiable sources. Sure the sources could be anonymous democrats; but they could also be Republican political operatives telling friendly journalists something that wouldn’t be credible if it had their name on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe I worded something poorly there and caused some miscommunication. I was responding to someone equating unverified with made up. What I was trying to say is that it’s unverified right now because the only statements on it were from what seems to be the same primary source(s) that wish to remain anonymous. That doesn’t necessarily mean the reporting is false, only that there hasn’t been a separate source saying the same thing. I wasn’t trying to say “it’s true actually, they just have to say it’s unverified because no one wants to put their name on saying it”

I then separately wanted to explain what seems to be the thought process behind people saying that Biden wouldn’t endorse Kamala going into the convention if he dropped out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Eeerrrrrgggghhhhhheeeerrrraaaaahhhhgggg

permalink
report
reply
8 points

DON’T

OPEN

DEAD

INSIDE

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t dead open inside. Don’t mind if I do!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Pity the poor Rawstory intern that had to slo-mo through that footage just to grab the worst screencap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Buddy, her standing face is just that screencap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

She looks like Dollar Store Melania.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

Melania is Dollar Store Melania. This person looks like Dollar Store Melania from wish.com

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Damn, you guys are on fire today.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments