11 points

Yeah, it’s all the EU’s fault and not at all companies pushing updates whenever. “Here’s a new update, we’ll install and restart your PC. Fuck you”

I know, it was a security update, patching a possible attack vector. I will take a very wild guess here and say that this has caused much more damage than what the update would ever protect from

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Then,Microsoft,just leave EU. Simple.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Msexit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

blEU screen of death

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They should, but then they’d be replaced by other US multinationals. So they won’t.

The EU (and not just the EU by the way) loves US tech. It can’t get enough. They both play a cat and mouse game with each other for the public but the EU aren’t going to force MS out and MS aren’t going to leave.

Put it another way, of the EU wanted to be principled and demand fairness for EU citizens they’d take away MS (and other US multinational’s) tax breaks via Dublin. But they’re not going to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Put it another way, of the EU wanted to be principled and demand fairness for EU citizens they’d take away MS (and other US multinational’s) tax breaks via Dublin. But they’re not going to do that.

The EU is literally doing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Literally dragging their heels over this. The biggest opposition was from EU bloc nations.

Now Ireland have eventually signed up to this but it’s a minimum threshold. i.e. they’re still highly comfortable about letting US multinational’s get away with complex tax arrangements in the EU to lower the amount they pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Typical MS gaslighting and manipulation to subvert meaningful regulation.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Why is Microsoft defending Crowdstrike?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

They aren’t, it’s more “it’s the EUs fault for forcing us to allow businesses like cloud strike to write kernel level antivirus, because we already have our own.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

My guess: Because they reviewed and signed the kernel space code which calls code that is unreviewed and unsigned (or, at the very least, pulls directly from files that are unreviewed and unsigned without proper validation or error checking), calling out CrowdStrike’s failure puts them on the hook too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly, wtf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
137 points

Microsoft has Windows Defender, its in-house alternative to CrowdStrike, but because of the 2009 agreement made to avoid a European competition investigation, had allowed multiple security providers to install software at the kernel level.

Its all the EU’s fault for having the temerity to think users should be able to control their own hardware instead of us!

permalink
report
reply
33 points

JUST LET US BE A MONOPOLY!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I’m still to see the doc where MS is forced to give ring-0, certified, boot-start to everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments