DefendingAIArt is a subreddit run by mod “Trippy-Worlds,” who also runs the debate sister subreddit AIWars. Some poking around made clear that AIWars is perfectly fine with having overt Nazis around, for example a guy with heil hitler in his name who accuses others of lying because they are “spiritually jewish.” So we’re off to a great start.

the first thing that drew my eye was this post from a would be employer:

not really clear what the title means, but this person seems to have had a string of encounters with the most based artists of all time.

also claims to have been called “racial and gender slurs” for using ai art and that he was “kicked out of 20 groups” and some other things. idk what to tell this guy, it legitimately does suck that wealthy people have the money to pay for lots of art and the rest of us don’t

Could we Ban the "No Al" Symbol? Someone proposed an idea to me: why not gather evidence and present it to the authorities who prohibited the display of the Swastika and other hate symbols? I was impressed by this suggestion. After researching, I found out that there are organizations that can categorize it as illegal if we can show evidence of the harm it has caused. I believe we can unite people, including artists who have suffered due to false accusations by anti-Al rioters, to support this cause. If we all sign a petition, we can ban the symbol, which would prevent its misuse on platforms like DeviantArt and stop the spread of misinformation. Would you support this initiative? Would you sign to end ignorance and compel them to advocate for fair regulations for Al, ensuring that nobody has to encounter this symbol and that those who use it for malicious purposes find no refuge?
Or is it just not possible? Let's discuss.

I really enjoyed browsing around this subreddit, and a big part of that was seeing how much the stigma around AI gets to people who want to use it. pouring contempt on this stuff is good for the world

the above guy would like to know what combination of buttons to press to counter the “that just sounds like stealing from artists” attack. a commenter leaps in to help and immediately impales himself:

you hate to see it. another commenter points out that well … maybe these people just aren’t your friends

to close out, an example of fearmongering:

So I made a post on a sub with a rule against Al
art and the Auto-mod does this...I'm assuming its fearmongering right? automod: Your comments and posts are being sold by Reddit to Google to train Al. You cannot opt out.

-3 points
*

Wtf did I just read

permalink
report
reply
5 points

thanks for your input, PenisDuckCuck9001

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

lol i just read his other comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think they took a look around when they posted that, and after they did we got the generic shitpost edit

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
15 points

haha I’ve asked dgerard what I should do about my habit of digging up stuff like this. before I left twitter it was almost a full time hobby. definitely have thought about starting a podcast

I don’t know of any podcasts or YT channels that focus on doing this kind of thing, but I think a lot of episodes of the QAA podcast fit this mold

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

lol i was thinking this post was 100% my bag

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Fascinating to see that the politics of the old crypto hype train have carried over to the new hype train.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

i couldn’t resist

at least when this rhetoric popped up around crypto and GameStop stocks, there was a get-rich-quick scheme attached to it. these fuckers are doing it for free

permalink
report
reply
13 points

‘thank you for pushing people further right’ is one of those really obvious 4chan attempts at psyops. I always get a bit amused when I see people pull that shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

> “(Redditors always glom on to the absolute worst things)”

> is a redditor describing how he glommed on to a thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“(Redditors always glom on to the absolute worst things)”

is a redditor on a sub in support of a bubble technology that runs on plagiarism, exploitation of highly vulnerable workers, and infrastructure that causes climate change, and also the sub is a Nazi bar

the aristocrats!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

is a redditor on a sub in support of a bubble technology that runs on plagiarism, exploitation of highly vulnerable workers, and infrastructure that causes climate change, and also the sub is a Nazi bar

the aristocrats!

this is what Curtis Yarvin actually believes

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

The guy going full abuser logic after being refused to buy some art of somebody. Jesus. (And like the artist doesn’t know you already tried to use their name, and are only coming for them with money afterwards).

E: looking at the post on reddit, turns out they already did something like this “Yesterday I got told to off myself after someone saw filenames over a screen share while I was working out a job for UI assets.”. Typical. (Still, death wishes are not cool (ow look in their post history they express similar things on others (even if it is spez) tad hypocritical), even if he really should look for a different hobby (Which I assume they are lying about anyway, coder art is no problem if it is just a hobby, and there are a large amount of free imagesets out there, famously like kenney who has free art sets because of community donations).

permalink
report
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 502

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators