It’s another example of how Trump and MAGA are attempting to undermine faith in the coming election. Trump lost the popular vote in both 2016 and 2020, so he might be making a preemptive strike at the legitimacy of the results should he lose the popular vote a third time. Still, it’s not clear why he’s telling his supporters not to vote at all. Perhaps it’s another example of the former president and convicted felon’s cognitive decline.

184 points

“I’m Kamala Harris, and I approve this message.”

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I have a sneaking suspicion that nougat is, in fact, NOT Kamala Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The sentence being enclosed in quotes is because it is a quote, in reference to this campaign release.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh, I’m aware, don’t mind me. Just being an ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

Because— no matter what happens; in his universe, he’s the winner… if he actually wins “see how great I am” — if he loses “see how they robbed us? “

He needs and must be the center of attention and adulation.

See also malignant narcissisms

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I served with a guy like this. He would always put himself at a disadvantage in any contest or game. If he won “he was so good he overcame you even at a handicap”, if he lost “yeah, but even with a handicap it was close”…so annoying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s like the dating strategy Todd Gak had used on Elaine in Seinfeld–he made a bet with her that Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars, saying he’d buy her dinner if he was wrong. She took him up on the bet, and since he was wrong he bought her dinner. The whole dinner had the makings of a date, though it had never been explicitly called one. It gave him cover, if the date didn’t go the way he liked he could always refuse another one without rocking the boat too much (or he could fall back on the bet excuse if she doesn’t show further interest too)… He’d found a “dating loophole” lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think it’s also he can’t stand to lose now. He was fine the first time, it was to launch his brand. Now it would be an insult to him, so he’d rather quit than lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trump only ever escalates, he never deescalates. So no, he would never quit. But you are absolutely right that losing again would be a huge insult to him. Bigger than before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So no, he would never quit.

I’m no expert, but as of this moment I don’t think he’ll go into the election while trailing. I think he’ll make up an excuse to drop out (liberal elite crossing guards, crooked something, the weather is woke, whatever), and from there he’ll do his original plan to get more right wingers on board to buy his crap while he dodges lawsuits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not only losing would trigger Trump; he lost to Kamala, a women of color. It would drive Trump insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sometimes I’ll observe a person and think, “I’ll go ahead and hope I’m wrong in my belief that there’s no afterlife, just for you.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
62 points

This man is genuinely retarded. If I didn’t think his ego was as huge as it is, I’d think this is a tactic to save face when he gets crushed in November.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

I mean, he’s incredibly unsubtle. Maybe he knows deep down that in a straight vote he’s going to lose, so people voting isn’t going to matter vs the amount of crime that’s going to be committed in early November?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

We call it developmentally disabled these days, bud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

When we’re talking about Trump it still seems appropriate somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

As do other words, even if we make them up.

DEMENTALIZED

ENDOOFED

BABYHANDERED

DECOGNITIFIED

SQUAREPEGIFULLY INTOROUNDHOLIDIFIED

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They’re struggling to come up with a plan… is he going to quit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I highly doubt it. One of the main reasons he wants the presidency is to pardon himself for everything and anything. And to be king.

Can’t do either of those things if he quits completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Perhaps he and his brain trust are somehow thinking they should abandon democratic process and peaceful transition of power altogether and actually try to stage a literal coup. Watch what the legislative leadership does. Johnson in particular. He’ll probably try some sketchy bullshit on January 6, 2025.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I swear I read that certain states have put in laws where they can ultimately refuse the outcomes of elections if they so choose, and the SCOTUS is already primed to be the deciding factor. I don’t recall if that was pure doom 'n gloom from his 2020 tantrums though

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, but the thing is, I really don’t think either Biden or Harris will take it lying down if the SC tries to straight up enable a coup. It would be categorically indefensible, even to Biden, who’s been frustratingly milquetoast in pushing back against their very obviously biased decisions of recent years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

We don’t need the votes, I have so many votes.

It’s…checks notes July. Color me skeptical.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

He’s already been told he has “the votes” now and has won. So if that turns out not to be happening the closer we get to November’s results, to him it will be a purely fraudulent steal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Anyone who’s going to vote for the Mango Mussolini has already decided to and nothing can convince them not to.

Likewise, everyone else who’s ever heard of him would never in a million years vote for him.

Contrary to the perennial Dem election strategy Plan 1992, there’s hardly any undecided voters. The only ones who truly are undecided have deliberately not followed politics for the last 8 years and are unlikely to vote.

So yeah, he already has all the votes he’s going to get and won’t lose any. Let’s just hope that he’s wrong about having enough to eke out an EC win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

I guess it simplifies the game plan. If there is only one outcome to prepare for, it’s easier to organise what you’re going to do.
Plus, it gives him a face save.
“NO, we did not lose that FRAUDULENT ELECTION. I told the GOOD people not to vote, and they did not. I will be holding my OWN, FREE ELECTION in florida on friday.”

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Ends up at some out of the way gas station/grocery store/auto shop named “Florida”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Honestly, I kinda hope that’s what demented don does. Hold a fake election that means less than nothing and have all his idiots not vote in the one that matters.

He’d lose, and wouldn’t be able to try his Couping 2: Electric Boogaloo

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh he’d still try the Couping 2: Electric Boogaloo. Just makes it more obvious to people who don’t have brain rot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Subtext: “…with blackjack and hookers”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments