133 points

I can see the allure for places wanting to keep certain trouble-makers out as a precaution, but this gets so close to a privatized social credit score that it’s beyond uncomfortable.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

I feel like you should not be allowed to record any data until there’s a documented case with a police report at minimum. At that point, potentially restricting action becomes a legitimate security need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Idk about that level of escalation being necessary, maybe just repeat offenses. Where I went to college it’s got to be super serious for police to come into a bar.

Repeat fights, or pukes on the floor, or belligerence to staff are all things I would think would be decent grounds to be turned away by ID. I mean, that happens now at gas stations and restaurants with security cam photos saying “don’t serve this person” posted at the register except it’s more public.

I suppose it depends what data is recorded though, they don’t need your home address.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can already handle people being repeated nuisances at a specific location without issue.

Sharing any information at all absolutely should require a police report (and I’m aware that they already violate privacy other ways; that’s also not OK).

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

yeah, promising security/convenience over liberty is how they reel us in every time

that and protecting the kids

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“Its website lists six behaviors customers can be flagged for: violence, assault, destruction of property, sexual assault, fraud, and theft.”

Seems like they’re missing an “overconsume” flag. If you ever had to cut someone off, that should be noted. 6 drink maximum or whatever.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

It would be nice if they put an AA flag as well and let people with addiction problems blacklist themselves on a voluntary basis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

This is clearly only the ones that negatively affect them (the bar).

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yeah, I’m half surprised there isn’t “under consume” on the list and they stop letting people in who don’t spend enough money

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They don’t really care about those. Their prices are high enough that their expenses are covered by the people who do drink.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Who decides this?

Some clown with tablet…

I wonder once that data leak if we can correlate for racism and classism and other clown behaviours

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

From the article:

Patronscan previously had a system flag for “substance abuse,” but this flag was removed in 2019, according to Mlikotin. Its privacy policy notes a California law that limits its flags to “fraud, abuse, and material representation.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

See, for me, “substance abuse” = “caught doing coke in the bathroom”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Why would a system meant to maximize the profit of the bar block out their best customers?

They only want to block fighters and predators because it hurts business, not for any moral reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Serving someone who has overconsumed can get you in trouble with the liquor authorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Honestly, I spent a lot of years tending bar, and most of the time, if someone was too drunk, it was my fault. Sure, there were times when someone was pre-gaming too hard or snuck in alcohol, but 9 times out of 10, if someone overconsumed, it was because I overserved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I commented elsewhere about this but it’s entirely dependent on the type of bar and event. That data will be used for holding bartenders who “overserve” liable for someone else’s behavior and there’s so many scenarios where you have no idea who has drank the correct amount.

Imagine working an event — a concert or wedding or anything like that — and some jackass manages to get too drunk. That should be on them but America is the most litigious society on Earth. There’s no way the bar and bartender won’t ever be sued and this data subpoenaed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s very true, although I think it’ll be unlikely that an individual bartender will get blamed for overserving in a large venue. I worked at a relatively small venue (280 at capacity) and on a busy night it would be difficult to tell you who served an individual customer, much less who gave him the drink that, “overserved,” them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

As someone in New Orleans who has bartended and done many other service industry jobs, eat pant. That will definitely be used in shittier cities to arrest/sue bartenders who “overserve” someone who then leaves and gets in trouble.

It’s basically impossible to keep track of every customer at crowded bars when you’re working your ass off, people buy rounds for each other, you’re worried about stocking the bar, cleaning glasses, etc. Imagine working at a music venue and being slammed for 3 or 4 hours for tips and then some ass gets you sued, fined, or arrested because you didn’t manage to remember every single person at the show.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Wow. It was worse than I thought. They’ll take your picture but won’t be using it for facial recognition?

I can see how they could easily “upgrade” their system for businesses to gather more data and be even less privacy friendly.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

Well… If you want to fight this, don’t go to these places. Deny them profit.

Otherwise it will go mainstream.

Similar thing with extra fees at restaurants. In my area most dropped them after consumer bakc lash.

Going to a bar is 100% luxury, you will 100% fine to avoid it.

Dont feed this corpo behaviour. Fuck em.

Find that local hood dive with a bartender who knows how to manage a shop. Support them, they are dying.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

This is why we need data protection laws here. We need to be able to control what these companies keep about us.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Yeah like I don’t have a problem with a shared database for bars to keep out bad actors. That sounds like a collaborative IRC banlist. But why does it have to involve keeping pictures of me and which bar I go to which night and all this other stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 507K

    Comments