This article is noteworthy for the historical track record of Cori Bush’s challenger, Wesley Bell. It covers how Bell betrayed the BLM movement despite the widespread support he received from it.

Also noteworthy are these two paragraphs that explain how Bell has incredible funding from the genocide enabling Israeli-aligned AIPAC lobby.

But rather than build his campaign against Hawley, Bell dramatically shifted his priorities, pivoting to mount a challenge against a left-wing Missouri politician instead. Last June, Bell called Cori Bush to promise he wouldn’t run against her. Then, after the Hamas attack in Israel on October 7 and the outbreak of Israel’s assault on Gaza, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) “let it be publicly known that a challenger to Bush would have effectively bottomless fundraising support,” writes Ryan Grim. Bell subsequently dropped out of his race against Hawley and turned around to challenge Bush. This opened the floodgates for the Israel lobby, which has spent a staggering $7 million on Bell’s run to capture Bush’s seat.

As of July 2024, AIPAC’s massive donations only account for 62 percent of Bell’s contributions — in part because Missouri Republicans have lavished Bell’s coffers. The Huffington Post reported that Bell’s campaign filings included donations “from notable sources such as Steven Tilley, a GOP former Missouri House speaker who’s now a lobbyist,” and “Daniel Loeb, the billionaire founder of the hedge fund Third Point, who has donated millions to Republican causes.”

33 points

For those who want to assist Cori Bush continue to speak truth to power - and who may legally do so (must be a USA citizen for starters, etc) - please visit:

https://coribush.org

The Democratic primary date is on August 6 in Missouri. Thanks and have a great day.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Is $7 million a lot in the context of a high-profile primary? How much money has Bush raised, and how much has been spent on her behalf?

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

Is $7 million a lot in the context of a high-profile primary

Yeah, it’s almost three times as much as Cori Bush has raised in total.

For broader context, this is the 5th most expensive US congressional primary EVER. Not just of St Louis. Not just of Missouri. Of the COUNTRY.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Thank you for this helpful information! It’s good to keep that in mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Jacobin Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Jacobin is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jacobin/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

permalink
report
reply
-28 points

Why should I care about this?

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Another country can use a PAC to pour unlimited amounts of money to influence US politics and you don’t feel like you should care about that? Replace Israel and Palestine with an issue you care about and someone funding your opponents view.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Isn’t AIPAC a US-organization funded by people in the US?

Its primarily US billionaires using PACs the indirectly bankroll politicians, which is not any better. They still have the goal of making policies to benefit themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Isn’t AIPAC a US-organization funded by people in the US?

In name only. Its sole purpose is to function as a de jure separated but de facto integrated part of the Israeli government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

You act like that is a unique problem related to Israel and Palestine. I think there are much bigger priorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You could list your priorities and probably find a PAC being funded by interests with more money than the average American can donate to the cause. This isn’t exclusive to Israel/Palestine, it’s just clear that Israel’s goal is to silence any voices that speak against them in Congress so they can continue to get their funding for more weapons.

At the end of the day, the Citizens United ruling has given special interests groups, including those who don’t have the success of America in their minds, outsized impacts on our elections and therefore our national and foreign policy.

It’s chilling to think that another country can come here, spend millions with little or no rules or oversight to influence our politics. The average American voter doesn’t have millions of dollars to pour into races to defend their interests. We’re continually having our voices diluted by corporate and now foreign spending. This was happening before but now with PACs it’s essentially opened the floodgates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Because Bush is one of the staunchest supporters of women’s reproductive rights in Congress, and the guy who is primarying her has not only betrayed his constituents before, but is also pretty definitely not a Democrat, and is being funded largely by conservative PACs as a spoiler/5th column candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks for the explanation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because it’ll be on the test.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 448K

    Comments