Hello all, sorry for such a newbish question, as I should probably know how to properly partition a hard drive, but I really don’t know where to start. So what I’m looking to do is install a Debian distro, RHEL, and Arch. Want to go with Mint LMDE, Manjaro, and Fedora. I do not need very much storage, so I don’t think space is an issue. I have like a 500+ something GB ssd and the few things that I do need to store are in a cloud. I pretty much use my laptop for browsing, researching, maybe streaming videos, and hopefully more programming and tinkering as I learn more; that’s about all… no gaming or no data hoarding.

Do I basically just start off installing one distro on the full hard drive and then when I go to install the others, just choose the “run alongside” option? or would I have to manually partition things out? Any thing to worry about with conflicts between different types of distros, etc.? hoping you kind folks can offer me some simple advice on how to go about this without messing up my system. It SEEMS simple enough and it might be so, but I just don’t personally know how to go about it lol. Thanks alot!!

5 points

One thing that might matter is that if all distros use the same swap partition for hibernation, you shouldn’t boot one distro after hibernating another or you might overwrite the saved RAM contents.

If you use different swap partitions or files, you probably should still avoid writing to a partition that belongs to a distro that isn’t actually shut down.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Ok, so maybe make a separate partition for each distro and a swap for each distro too? I’m also confused about the bootloader part too. I’ve never manually partitioned for a distro before, just always did the auto/recommended route.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think the easier solution would be not to use hibernation - either shut the system down properly or use suspend-to-RAM.

If everything works, the bootloader should be whichever GRUB version comes with the distro you install first and the other distros’ installers should just add entries to boot them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Perfect! Thanks for this info. Sounds much easier. Is there one particular bootloader you think would be BEST for multibooting different distro types? My guess would be a Debian system first probably? and do you recommend I make separate partitions for everything or just install the other distros into the same partition as the first install?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No need for manual partitioning, just resize the storage partition of the former distro, install automatically, repeat

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh and just to be sure, I need to use the live iso for the distro in order to resize partitions, is that right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Warning: this is definitively doable, but messier than it looks like. I’d recommend you to partition it manually, before installing any distro, like this:

  • one partition per distro. For sizes check their requirements. Given 500GB I’d probably reserve 60GB for each, perhaps a bit more if I know that I’ll install a lot of stuff in that distro.
  • one swap partition, that’ll be accessed across distros. Optional if you have 16GB+ of RAM.
  • use the leftover space for a “storage” partition, for personal files that you won’t save in someone else’s computer (i.e. the cloud). That allows you to mess with the distros without risking your personal files.

Don’t worry too much on getting the space right though - if necessary you can always resize a few partitions after installation. It’s a bit of a bother though.

Do not share /home across distros, it’s simply more trouble than it’s worth. Instead, mount that “storage” partition in each distro, inside your /home/[$username] directory.


Another thing that you might want to consider is virtualisation. Odds are that you won’t use a lot of those distros in your everyday, and that you’re just curious about their differences. In that case, consider installing one of them, install Virtualbox in it, and then the other distros get installed inside Virtualbox. I’m suggesting that because it’ll use overall less space, and make distro management less messy.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Thanks. I do not want to mess around with virtualization; I went down that rabbithole before and got lost and broke stuff lol. I need to do a bit more research and learning before im more confident with virtualization. So how large should the swap be? and what about a bootloader?? Are all three compatible with grub? also how large should the bootloader partition be? thanks, this is all a bit foreign to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

VM are as easy as point and click with GNOME Boxes, also available as standalone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Gotcha. Never explored Gnome boxes yet; probably just waiting for the right time. I’ve been trying to learn a whole lot of other tech stuff, so I sorta put virtualization on the back burner for now. Definitely wanna learn about KVM, lxd and lxc and even gnome boxes. just not right now

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Grub is compatible with pretty much everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dude please excuse my ignorance, but I would obviously need to make a bootloader partition, but do I have to like download grub software and install it on that partition or is that something the system will do during the partitioning process itself?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

All those distros are compatible with grub, and come with their own copies of it. You just need to install your distros, and then when you say “I want THIS ONE to manage boot”, you follow this tutorial. (It’s supposed to help you reinstalling grub after Windows, but it works fine for grub after another Linux instal).

Or, if you want to be lazy - install last the distro that you want to manage boot, then tell it “screw the current boot, reinstall it”.

I wouldn’t bother with a bootloader partition. The bootloader runs fine from any distro partition, and it’s small enough so you don’t need to worry about it wasting space.

swap

I’ve been running my system without swap whatsoever for quite some time, and it runs fine. But if you’re planning to use hibernation or similar, reserve the same amount of swap space as you have RAM; for example if you have 8GB RAM then at least 8GB swap.

IMPORTANT: if hibernating a distro, don’t boot another distro, otherwise the hibernation data will get wiped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Perfect! I will be disabling hibernation in Bios. Also, how exactly do you choose a default bootloader when each distro automatically installs their own? not sure on that process. Or do things like display managers matter? or is Xorg or Wayland pretty much good for all three?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What?

  1. Install virt-manager qemu qemu-kvm
  2. Run virt-manager
  3. Install a new distro, choose the .iso that you downloaded, assign 8GB RAM and 60GB storage
  4. Leave the rest default
  5. Follow the Distros installing process as usual
  6. Delete the VM if you are done

Important note: using distrobox or toolbox you can run packages of pretty much any distro on your Laptop. I am currently using Ubuntu PPA VLC 4.0 on Fedora Kinoite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So virt manager, KVM, and qemu is the recommendation solution for this? Opposed to other methods like virtual box or gnome boxes or the other various virtualization platforms out there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh I just watched a video about home. So is that a partition of it’s own? the guy was saying he was using different homes for each distro and it became a mess, so he planned to install one home directory for all distros… idk?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

/home is a directory (“folder”). Inside that directory, there’s one subdirectory for each user, where you’re expected to keep your personal files, configuration files, user data from software (e.g. save games from your games), stuff like this, personal data.

And Linux allows you to mount any partition in any directory of your choice.

Because of those two things, a lot of people create a partition and mount it as /home. So if something bad happens with the distro, and you need to reinstall it, your princess is in another castle your data is in another partition, safely stored. It’s usually a good idea, but in your case it’s a bad idea - because your /home/[insert username] directory from one distro will be likely the same as in the other distros, so they’ll interfere on each other, and software user data will become a mess.

Instead, what I recommend you is to not create a /home partition. Let each distro have its own /home. However, do create a partition to store your data, and mount it inside your /home/[insert your username] directory. That way you can access all your files from all your distros, but the software user data won’t be mixed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ahh brilliant! so create ONE storage partition and just mount that one partition in each distro’s home directory?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Really nice idea with the shared swap and storage!

Caveats:

  • you can LUKS encrypt that, but you may need to tweak some polkit rules to automatically unlock it.
  • Fedora uses zram and swap and SELinux is a hell of a task

Apart from that, great recommendation!

In the end you can simply delete all partitions except your storage partition, reinstall any distro and mount that partition to /home

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fedora’s swap on zram shouldn’t pose a problem - at most it won’t use the disk swap, but other distros still would.

Encryption is important but I wonder if OP would make much use out of it, given that he plans to bulk store his items in the cloud. The storage partition would be mostly for things “at hand”. And if necessary, as you said, some elbow grease lets you have encryption and still access it from all distros.

I don’t recommend OP to mount that partition directly to /home itself. It’s bound to create problems later on due to software in different versions interacting with software that may or may not be present depending on the distro. Mounting it inside some other directory (even inside /home, e.g. /home/username/storage) feels considerably safer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right you would then have something like

  • swap
  • zram
  • /home/user/storage
  • boot
  • boot/efi
  • /
  • boot
  • boot/efi
  • /
  • boot
  • boot/efi

What a mess. But if you kinda keep track of what is what (maybe search for the packages dnf apt yay and so on) it can work

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not an answer to your question, but have you checked out Bedrock Linux as opposed to installing multiple distros? Or maybe using virtual machines?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I have HEARD of Bedrock but never really read about it. I will give it a check out now. Not too interested in VM’s ATM

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Bedrock linux is not a vm. It is a meta distro means it runs on top of your distros kernel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh I wasn’t inferring Bedrock was VM, was just saying I dont want to explore the VM route… I tried to before and messed things up lol though I will learn about it down the road! I’ll read up on Bedrock though

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Have you tried distrobox ? That would sound more reasonable.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Never heard of this one. Some more research to do! Thanks for all the info

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Its a container tool using Podman or Docker.

See a video on “container vs. Virtual machine”.

What Distrobox does is downloading container images or any distro basically. It uses your system Kernel still, but all the libraries and packages are from the distro.

I.e. you can install Arch (AUR too), Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Opensuse packages on any distro.

The only thing not working are Flatpak and Snap as they need systemd

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But would you need flatpak and snap with aur

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Darn, I do like to use flatpaks and occasionally snaps… I know I know, most people hate them lol. But the big question for going the VM route is, do the distros I load up remember all my settings, configs, programs, etc? I want them to be like actual desktop distros where everything stays in tact and I’m not resetting everutime I boot up a VM iso

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It could be done if you partition your disk prior to installing but, if there is no particular reason, you could make a bunch of VM’s and daily drive one of the distros.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

ummmm I dont really think I can give a good reason lol, just the way I want to do it. I feel if they’re physically installed on my system, it would sort of force me to use other options, thus furthering my learning. I feel VMs or more impersonal and temporary. I use Ventoy for live OSs just to get a feel for things, but when it actually comes to daily use, I’d rather have them installed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

pick one. you’ll end up with a favorite you use all of the time anyway, and sooner than you expect–after rebooting into this-or-that constantly to run something specific that’s set up in it, or when you get tired of duplicating efforts a half-dozen times in all of them. you’ll soon forget which distro has which app set up which way.

the rest in VMs so you can be familiar with their package management, system layout, and such. You can spin 'em up, destroy 'em, run them simultaneously, try out a new package or application or configuration, whatever; and in that process, mess shit up (it happens) without any damage done to your daily-use OS.

you mess up your octo-boot system and it won’t boot up. you need answers. your only pc is on vacay. what are you gonna do? use your phone’s tiny screen and poke questions or searches into google or stack one letter at a time? nah, mate. don’t make it difficult when it don’t need to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

well damn lol… this is deflating. I honestly would rather avoid VMs for now. trying to focus more on the meat and potatoes of Linux and other topics. I took a deep dive down virtualization and I got lost quickly and broke some stuff haha not really sure if now is the time for me to learn it. I’ve sorta put it on the backburner for now. So no easier, alternatives? You think manually doing this is not a good idea?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have a recommended virtualization platform for such a project like this? Looks like that will be the route to take. I just want them to be actual workstations that keep all your settings and everything in place, not just like a sandbox to play around with. Not only do I want to learn other distros but I would like the option of actually using them for daily use as well

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 9.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments