11 points

“Did anyone notice the funny that you could literally only guess at?”

Odd way to write.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Well, it is obvious that calque is not a calque. But I did not care to notice that until it was pointed out explicitly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“…I did not care to notice…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

English is my second language. How should it be written instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Neurodivergence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

curated tumblr is the best sub on reddit and lemmy

permalink
report
reply
7 points

curated lemmy is the best blog in tumblr

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It will be a memorable day when I see on Lemmy a screenshot of a Twitter, Tumblr or Reddit post screenshotting Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A facebook post screenshot of a tumblr post of a twitter screenshot of a reddit screenshot of a threads screenshot of a lemmy post. Also known as the social media singularity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Hey Japan? Yeah we already have three discreet words for “savory,” “meaty,” and “delicious” - you can have your ambiguous catch-all back.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Sure but having a singular catchall for the phenomena around that taste is actually better and I would argue more discrete (wait wtf is it discrete or discreet?). Imagine if we had to describe the fundamental tastes like this:

  • Salty
  • Sweet
  • Sour
  • Bitter
  • Savory, meaty and delicious
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Except that you can have savory that isn’t meaty, meaty that isn’t savory, and deliciousness is 100% subjective, so I’m afraid your logic for replacing 3 different English adjectives with one Japanese one is fundamentally flawed. If anything, Japanese needs to pick one definition and import some new words to make up the difference.

Or just admit that the languages work differently and that what works for Japanese doesn’t work for English, and trying to make it fit just sounds pretentious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I guess I’ve never put enough thought into it to feel the term was pretentious. Based on my understanding of what the term was describing, I figured that the Japanese had just come up with a good bow to put on a complex flavor that is difficult to sum up succinctly in English. Calling the flavor “meaty” is not very complete at all because really what is being described is not a meat flavor but something that often is paired with meat flavoring. Mushrooms have umami, and beef jerky, and cheddar cheese, and ghee, yet none of these things taste much of anything alike.

You’re right that something can be meaty but not savory, and to your defense I should not have claimed “deliciousness” as a component of umami—that’s not really a taste descriptor but a preference. I find tart green olives to be delicious (and incredibly savory) but my fiance hates them. But the point about savoriness and meatiness is that they are both just incomplete, adjacent terms to describe a particular flavor profile missing in English. Savory is probably the closest match, but even so could something be umami and not savory?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

discrete

That’s the correct one for your usage of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Very sneaky, those words are

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Which one is that? Umami?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Post about linguistics, but they used i.e. when they meant e.g.

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

ie and eg are colloquially synonyms like literally and figuratively

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ugh, you’re one of THOSE…

The colloquial use is only better when it enhances understanding of what you’re trying to say. Mixing up eg and ie does the opposite and every time you mean figuratively but say literally, an angel is waterboarded.

In conclusion: stop torturing angels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Which are literally not synonyms though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Correct. Literally, and literally all of its synonyms, really, truly, actually, honestly, etc, have been used as intensifiers for hundreds of years. Both for factually true and hyperbolic statements. The real irony is that a real purist against evolving usage of words should stop and look at the word a little harder, it originally was used in regards to literature. Specifically letters, as in correspondence, IIRC. Using it to mean something that is precisely true is just as much a perversion as any meaning that came after that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Is a post about linguistics colloquial?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Anyone looking to remember the difference: “id est” (that is) vs “exemplī grātiā” (for the sake of an example). You use the first to clarify meaning, and the second to begin a non-exhaustive list of examples.

What matters is ultimately if you can convey your ideas, so using the wrong term is fine when people can still figure out what you meant. But it’s still a good idea to learn the difference, because there will be times when mixing up “i.e.” and “e.g.” will create ambiguity or misunderstanding.

The best idea is maybe to use “for example” or “that is to say”. The former could be abbreviated to “f.ex.” like in Norwegian, and the latter could be abbreviated “t.i.t.s.”

…Alright, on second thought maybe don’t abbreviate that one.

In any case, the Wikipedia Manual of Style recommends avoiding use of “e.g.” and “i.e.” in regular running text altogether, saying that these abbreviations are better fit for parentheticals, quotations, citations, tables, and lists. This is because there is no word or character limit on Wikipedia, nor is there on Tumblr, and so the language is more clear when abbreviations are avoided. Even when someone is using “i.e.” and “e.g.” in the prescribed way, that doesn’t guarantee that the reader knows the distinction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

what is the point of the distinction even? ‘that is’ make sense to introduce an example and vice versa

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I guess another way to put it is that “i.e.” is more specific while “e.g.” is more general. So “i.e.” carries an energy of “I am referring very specifically to the following” while “e.g.” means “there are other things that I’m not mentioning”. So the use of “i.e.” in the Tumblr post would imply that “tattoo”, “sushi”, and “guillotine” are the only loanwords in the English language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

To add to the explanations, here are some examples that might help:
There are various transportation methods, e.g. cars

There are various transportation methods, i.e. ways for a person to move from one location to another

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

One gives a definition or clarification and the other is a set of examples. If you do that with a word that your listener has never seen or heard before, you will miscommunicate.

Here watch when I use made up words:

I enjoy multifacetous martialific numbrate (i.e., chess).

If I selected carelessly, does this mean I like games or that I specifically like chess? Maybe here it doesn’t matter, but what if I’m describing a category of things I’m allergic to vs a specific example? It’s worth being able to articulate either case distinctly no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I remember “eg” as “example given” and “ie” as “in explanation”. Nice mnemonic ways imho

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I remember it as eg-zample.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Felt like I was having a déjà vu when watching Tom Scott’s latest video (https://youtu.be/TFpzps-DCb0) but I dug a bit deep to find where I read it. He spoke about the same thing!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

He totally saw this meme when it was doing the rounds

permalink
report
parent
reply

Curated Tumblr

!curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works

Create post

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):

-web

-iOS

-android

Please begin copied raw text posts (lacking a screenshot that makes it apparent it is from Tumblr) with:

# This has been reposted here to Lemmy as part of the “Curated Tumblr Project.”

I made the icon using multiple creative commons svg resources, the banner is this.

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 301

    Posts

  • 6.4K

    Comments

Community moderators