2 points

Christopher Caudwell has some pretty excellent critiques of bourgeois science. Scientific progress has stalled because it is no longer profitable for the bourgeoisie, and the world’s best scientists are all bootlickers, at least inside the imperial core. There’s a reason the best physicists in the 20th century were all communists. But China thankfully is turning this situation around.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Every American researcher works for advertising companies, even if they don’t realize it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Gravity is easy, it’s the entropic magnetic charge from protons and electrons.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

one unresolved corner of physics

Hardly! People board airplanes every single day and we still don’t fundamentally understand the mechanisms of how lift works.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

I heard that it was just the angle of the wings redirecting the air downwards as reaction mass, like how a rocket engine shoots air downwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It is both, but the pressure one contributes more to lift. You can see this when a wing stalls, the airflow separates from the upper surface and the pressure difference is gone. The angle of a stalled wing still means air is directed downwards, but the overall lift is much smaller.

At least that is what I’ve been told anyways

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lift works the same way a tennis racket does.

We know exactly why and how.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

When I thought there was higher pressure under the wing that pushed the plane up, I was happy. When I started thinking, instead, about little vacuum vortices above the wings pulling them up instead, I was suddenly much less comfortable with the whole proposition. Given the options and the limited effect on my daily life, I’m gotta go with Newton over Bernoulli on this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

vacuum vortices above the wings pulling them up

We know vacuums don’t “pull” things. Instead it’s air pressure elsewhere that isn’t balanced by the vacuum that moves things in the direction of the vacuum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

¿Porque no los dos?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Wait how do we not know how lift works?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How do we not know how gravity works??

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s elusive, man. Lack of symmetry really fucks with our shit, yo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think it’s more so that we know HOW it works but we don’t know WHY it works

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t get it, how can you know how it works but not how? Or is it some philosophical why are the laws the way they are?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think it’s more so that we know HOW it works

Speak for yourself. I’m a student pilot and most of my instructors (who are either retired airline pilots or are trying to build up flight hours to qualify for an airline job) don’t understand the science behind it. To be fair, understanding the science doesn’t really help you fly a plane…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We don’t? I thought we kind of did

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

So here’s my lunesta fuelled dea on gravity.

Gravitons, like the rest of the standard model, are real. In order to measure them, we need incredibly high energy collisions.

In attempting to do this, our universe was created on accident. This is because our universe is in a black hole. But the cool shit is that black holes are really portals into our own universe. Instead of the energy spontaneously appearing as measurable particles, it’s dark energy causing the expansion of the universe. The Dark energy ends up being gravitons, because gravitons are a boson and only interact with matter with the gravitational force. the black holes, then, take in “normal” fermions and bosons and spit out the gravitons. The graviton release causes an expansion of space time by “pulling” space time with it.

none of that is backed up by anything

permalink
report
reply
0 points

You’re sure the universe wasn’t created by purpose? You’re sure it was on accident?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Add some string theory into the mix and it’s indistinguishable from Michio Kaku rambles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That particle accelerator really was the peak huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Missing a few turtles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Turtles all the way down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Don’t forget the elephants!

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

It’s not difficult. Gravity is like magnetism for things that aren’t magnetic.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Yeah but if you scratch a little bit the surface, the comparison falls quickly. Okay, magnetism has two signs. Why not gravity ? Why does it attract and not repel? Okay, magnetism is carried by photons. What carries gravity?

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Also for those that are magnetic

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I will assume that to be true, because it makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

gravity applies to everything with mass. But also light which has no mass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wrong. Magnets don’t float.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Sweet just tell me how to find same polarity gravimagnetics to put under my hoverboard

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You just need some isolated antimatter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Or matter with negative mass :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Available at your local Fal-mart.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 87K

    Comments