Huawei Technologies and China’s top chipmaker SMIC have built an advanced 7-nanometre processor to power its latest smartphone, according to a teardown report by analysis firm TechInsights.

Huawei’s Mate 60 Pro is powered by a new Kirin 9000s chip that was made in China by Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC), TechInsights said in the report shared with Reuters on Monday.

Huawei started selling its Mate 60 Pro phone last week. The specifications provided advertised its ability to make satellite calls, but offered no information on the power of the chipset inside.

The processor is the first to utilise SMIC’s most advanced 7nm technology and suggests the Chinese government is making some headway in attempts to build a domestic chip ecosystem, the research firm said.

36 points

When I look at https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3233166/while-under-us-sanctions-where-did-huawei-get-advanced-chips-its-latest-mate-60-pro-smartphone then explanation #3 sounds the most probable, that those are chips they stockpiled before TSMC cut them off.

This would also explain why they’re not making a big deal of it. If China was able to do it themselves that would have been such a big deal and the propaganda machine would be spinning. But they refuse to give the full specs now and don’t say how they got it etc.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

TechInsights said SMIC used existing equipment and its second-generation 7-nm process to manufacture the 5G-capable Kirin 9000s for Huawei

Huawei was known to have been stockpiling chips from its HiSilicon unit before TSMC cut ties to comply with US sanctions

From what I understand China does not know how to make their own lithography equipment and they had to be imported from abroad. It’s specifically one of the things the sanctions are targeting. The second paragraph is interesting and it answers a question I had earlier about how they were sourcing their silicone. In the <9nm regime its really important that the silicone is amorphous, if it’s crystalline then lithography will fail since the edges it will etch will be jagged from the crystalline structure of the silicone. So my guess is they can’t make their own silicone either, at least not for etching 7nm chips.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Here’s a bit of geopolitics for you, Taiwan can make lithography equipment, which is why China has been so aggressive about Taiwan lately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I don’t believe this is true, though I’m certainly no expert on the subject. Taiwan Semiconductor is the largest manufacturer of the chips, but they use lithography equipment manufactured by the Dutch company ASML.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

ASML (Dutch company) are the ones making the most advanced lithography machines right now. Taiwanese industry no doubt has some expertise, but I would guess it’s mainly around building and running the fab not necessarily the intricate workings of the machines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Indeed

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Once China has semiconductor manufacturing abilities comparable to Taiwan’s, one of the major deterrents to its invading Taiwan is removed. And outside of Taiwan it seems other countries are largely struggling to modernize and scale up their own semiconductor manufacturing, notably including the USA. China might see it as quite attractive to invade Taiwan and wipe out the West’s technology base, thereby ending up with the world’s most advanced manufacturing in China. Other countries would either have to suffer without computers or buy Chinese chips, and China would have de facto control of computing around the world, at least for a while.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

“Once China has semiconductor manufacturing abilities to Taiwan’s” is a long way off, if ever. China has demonstrated a complete lack of aptitude and technical prowess in this field. For the foreseeable future they are going to be stuck importing what they can from Taiwan and unable to change that reality because the island state is protected by the most powerful military in the region.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

The thing is they do not, they don’t know how to make the equipment or the materials. It’s like if they bought a disassembled bike from Amazon, and then claim to be a bike manufacturer after putting it together. It would take espionage and decades of development to reach Taiwans level. I said this in another comment, this stuff is not developed overnight, it’s a monumental undertaking. India tried and failed and the US is now spending billions to bring fabs to the US and they will have to do it with the cooperation of Taiwan and it will take years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

one of the major deterrents to its invading Taiwan is removed.

You mean one of the major benefits? The biggest reason China wants Taiwan is to be competitive in semi-conductors.

Not sure why you people keep making up these narratives. It’s painfully obvious to anyone who’s paying attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There’s no way China gets TSMC facilities intact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right. An invasion of Taiwan would mean a war between US and China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There are some holes in your story. Samsung and Intel are still way ahead of the SMIC.

China produced some chips, but they don’t have a good way to scale it up. To produce these chips they used ASML lithography machines which they can’t buy anymore.

and China would have de facto control of computing around the world, at least for a while.

This is not going to happen …

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Another deterrent is giving up any trading with Western countries and giving the crown of “factory of the world” to India which would do anything to get that.

Nobody with a brain would intentionally choose to only trade with Russia, Iran and North Korea in exchange of a relatively tiny island. (Well, Putin did something like that, but I said “someone with a brain”)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is exactly why western country wouldnt let China invade Taiwan. The real threat comes when the west can get chips without Taiwan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Unless Trump is president and they just give him a bribe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Trump started this recent confrontation with China. It’s one issue which has bipartisan support among both politicians and population. Just surrendering Taiwan would be too stupid even for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Not here nor there but Kirin 9000 is a sick name

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Someone at Mediatek thought so too, they have the Dimensity 9000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This shouldn’t be too surprising, China has had 7nm process capability for at least two years now https://www.tomshardware.com/news/china-first-7nm-gpu-heads-to-production

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It would be surprising if China was using domestic fabrication technology.

On Wednesday, [Tianshu Zhixin] confirmed our suspicion that BI was made using TSMC’s 7nm FinFET process.

Or if it was… you know, actually available to purchase.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 273K

    Comments