260 points

Here’s an AP source if you prefer not to click the daily beast.

permalink
report
reply
149 points

“I just wanted to check out my future plane… I also wanted to go say hello to the vice president and ask her why she refuse to answer questions from the media,” Vance said, jabbing at Harris.

W E I R D GUY

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points
*

It’s not unheard of during a general election campaign for opposing candidates to cross paths as they travel, especially given the compressed map that limits much of the campaign activity to a relative few states that will determine the Electoral College winner.

But also, what exactly is the AP doing here? The Trump campaign purposefully scheduled JD Vance to follow Harris to all these places after she released her schedule. They’re not just “crossing paths as they travel,” he’s literally following her

PS What is Trump even doing this week? Is Vance campaigning alone now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

If you’re poor, or non-white, they call that “stalking”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The creeps are fucking creepy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

Trump is too old to keep up with Kamala’s schedule. And he hates the photos of the same venue really full for Kamala and half full for him, so he’s avoiding the comparison like he’s avoiding the debate. He hates being seen to lose. He’s the world’s sorest loser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That poor guy…why schedule the scrub newbie to go on stage after the major blowout headliner? Must be Vance’s punishment for sucking. Gonna be fun when Kamala starts posting up the comparison of each event he follows to hers. HAHAHAHA

and yeah, I get trump’s “strategy”, but he is using checkers in a chess game and expecting the same plays to work.

Uncreative, boring, poorly thought out. Weird ancient strats in a modern battlefield. Weak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s not so much a strategy as being unable to keep up with Kamala physically or in crowd sizes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So many couches and so little time

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Vance, continuing his jocular jabbing, said he’d be more than willing to debate Harris on Aug. 13 “if she’d like to do a debate with me.” That was a matchup scheduled before Biden stepped down, meaning it would have put Vance and Harris on the same stage as vice presidential rivals.

Actually, I think it would be good to change the standard routine of having the VP candidates debate each other, to having them debate the opposing presidential candidates. Then we’d get to see the top-ticket candidates debate two opponents each, instead of just each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She should challenge him to show up in September to NBC

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They should set up debate podiums at all these places he’s following her and have her stand there, ready to debate. Then we can watch him turn as chicken shit as Trump and refuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The first question she should ask him would be "why am I debating you and not mister “any time, any place”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Much better source without a bullshit headline. Thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Vance, continuing his jocular jabbing

Is that some new type of sectional I’ve never heard of?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You keep him the hell away from my new Ashley Jocular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

🙏

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thanks.

While the daily beast is a fun read, it’s hard to make out where they exaggerate and dramatify things

permalink
report
parent
reply
218 points

Does…he realize she’s the current Vice President and that’s an Air Force plane? Dude rolls up on it like he’s about to do a panty raid.

Or does he realize it, and just have that little respect for the office he’s running for and its current occupant?

permalink
report
reply
85 points

Please let him find out how quickly he can placed on a no fly list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points
*

It’s a photo op, he had no direct intention to board and was likely surprised he made it as far as he did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

He wanted a photo op of himself looking impotent and awkward? Maybe he’s as weird as they say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Some people are into humiliation, don’t kinkshame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I would have preferred he got a little further and got tackled from behind the knees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Dude doesn’t realize that most of his toe jam comes from his socks, this is a completely fabricated individual with zero understanding of the real world

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Doesn’t he get a secret service detail since he’s VP candidate? I image some pretty easy, but unusual, phone calls were made

permalink
report
parent
reply
176 points

What the fuck is wrong with that guy

permalink
report
reply
106 points

He fucks couches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

While searching for Dolphin porn fetishes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s sick and gross and weird. What kind of websites have those type of videos and/or pics? What are the addresses to those sites? I want to make sure I never click on them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

He’s weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

He’s a sad weirdo who is jealous of the free time and money being childless allows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Who also hates his children.

Why else would he stay silent when Dementia Donny was trying to mock a biracial woman?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He’s weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
154 points

I’ve said it before I’ll say it again. Of all the Republican weirdness in recent years, I truly don’t understand why they seem to have made a conscious decision to become the biggest-asshole-in-the-room party.

permalink
report
reply
71 points

In recent years? brother they’ve been the “biggest asshole in the room” party since at least Nixon; they just have to keep outdoing themselves

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

It used to be that those guys were on the fringes of the party. Nixon was a crook, but he established the EPA and OSHA. That was just a normal thing for a Republican to do in the 1970s.

The GOP is a big tent party, and so they’ve always had room for the extreme right wing. These days, the tent is getting smaller, and unless you’re an out-and-out fascist you’re not really welcome. Unfortunately, half the country feels a stronger tie to that party than to their country, so they’re squeezing into that smaller tent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I mean yes, but this feels intentional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

They’re paying the price for all their education funding cuts.

Nixon was scummy and a little bit too evil… but he was well educated and wasn’t dumb

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s different though. Even W and his admin at least felt that they had to keep up a certain decorum. Trump said shit every day that Bush would have probably considered political suicide to even get caught saying in private, if a recording got out.

Nixon resigned when things were looking bad for him, Trump just doubles down. Like this entire campaign is pretty much him trying to get a crown because, for a while at least, it looked like that would be his only way of avoiding consequences for some of the shit he’s done. Though, to be fair, Nixon resigning might have been his way of avoiding the consequences because he knew he was getting a pardon. But even that shows a difference because Nixon never seriously considered just trying to pardon himself, at least not in public, while it was a big topic during Trump’s presidency.

Also Nixon resigned because he knew impeachment was a real possibility because even his own party wouldn’t risk their own political careers to protect a criminal president. With Trump, my pov is the rules need a complete overhaul because they can’t handle the level of bad faith present in the government now.

In hindsight, it was naive to rely on gentlemen’s rules to keep the government running smoothly, but those rules were at least followed in appearance until 2016 (though the conservatives did start using them in bad faith before that, like with Obama’s supreme court nomination).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh yeah it’s different; I said as much. They have to keep upping the ante to remain edgy, in their cold white fascist way. Trump didn’t give a shit about the subtlety though, he was like “I can steal this all away from these weak assholes and all I have to do is give the crowd what they really want”

Now we have a narcissist whose ego has been stroked by what he perceives to be the whole world. Very dangerous with all the secrets and codes, let alone everything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Because it works. Acting like a childish bully still gets the adoration from the “peaked in high school” MAGA voter base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

peaked in high school

Seriously an all too common overlap on the venn diagram. I might also add receiving public assistance. Yet they vote for the party trying to limit or stop that assistance 🤦‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

They represent people that are also actively trying to be the biggest assholes in the room

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“Of all the Republican weirdness in recent years, I truly don’t understand why they seem to have made a conscious decision to become the biggest-asshole-in-the-room party.”

Recent? They’ve been doing this shtick since at least Newt Gingrich in the 90s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

The thing is, I was alive and an adult then, and I knew otherwise OK people who were single issue voters who therefore voted republican. I may have disagreed with them on a thing or three, but we could get along OK. It either wasn’t as pervasive, or somehow didn’t hit my sphere. (And I was living in the south at the time)

Now - everyone who I know is a republican is just a raging confrontational asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I made the comment because Gingrich took confrontational politics and brought it to the National level. The era of Fox News and the 24hr news cycle was starting and he was the architect of the sensational hyper partisan angry Republicanism that we see today on right wing media. I don’t think Gingrich actually believed what he is pushing. He pushed it because it got the results he wanted.

Fast forward 30 years and now we have social media and the internet all vying for attention. Only the most extreme views that are controversial enough get noticed and commented on.

Some of the people I know who were Republicans have moderate enough views that they don’t feel the party is in step with them anymore. But I know Republicans who are true MAGA supporters and just parrot the grievances of their party. They all seem to emulate that anger

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Speaking as another older adult in Canada and witnessing the slide in both countries my controversial opinion is it’s not about politics at all. Politics are simply a symptom of an underlying problem with the society we have built.

What you’re seeing is classic behaviour of when a person is unheard, stressed and angry. It is scientifically proven when you experience those struggles you are less likely to think clearly and what options you have become limited. You start looking at every problem like a nail and you’re a hammer.

Individually we all deal with adversity different and I’d argue one party is heavily weighed with those who struggle with dealing with the adversity meanwhile since the 60’s governments have been doing nothing to improve life and lessen the adversity people deal with.

Then you have all those people struggling… And you throw in predators taking advantage of them, feeding into their struggles and weaponizing them.

At some point we all need to acknowledge we can’t fix this overnight and these people for the most part aren’t crazy. They’re you just a few medical bills behind or a few months laid off from your job. Hurt people hurt people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trump showed them that giving in to your base desires and letting your asshole flag fly gets you great success and makes you a good person. In their eyes anyway. Unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s the natural conclusion of the strategy republicans set into motion to manipulate their base.

It started just after Watergate. Nixon was facing massive calls for justice from both sides. Republican think tanks realized that their base of conservatives consumed news from all sources that informed their mostly unbiased decision to hold their guy accountable. So those republican think tanks devised a plan to create a conservative news outlet that explicitly demonized other news so that the conservative base would never turn on one of their own again. That strategy was realized in the 90’s with the creation of Fox News.

Since then, conservative media has been slowly transforming politics from the perspective of the average conservative into a team sport, where the main motivation isn’t “who runs the country better” but rather “my team is better than yours”.

It wasn’t so pervasive 20 years ago, but conservative media has found themselves with a base that now only responds to the outrage they’ve been conditioning them with, and that has created the raging confrontational assholes you see today.

Being a conservative doesn’t mean what it used to. And that’s because the Republican leadership robbed conservatives of that in order to maintain control of their base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
132 points

So the party with a history of inciting vigilante violence storms a VPs airplane and isn’t shot dead by secret service.

Is there an issue with the secret service actually doing their job, or do they just give Republicans a pass?

permalink
report
reply
23 points

So the party with a history of inciting vigilante violence storms a VPs airplane and isn’t shot dead by secret service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

as a vp candidate from a major party, vance also gets secret service protection

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

So… secret service vs secret service shootout? Maybe it happened and it was so secret no-one knows about it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My dad knows a guy who got shot. Totally. He works with him over at that place where the cheese is made. I mean beer. They make all the beer together and they’re good friends and I know him too. My dad can beat up your dad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They probably view Vance less as a threat and more as an awkward and socially oblivious guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

What if they thought they smelled fentanyl or heard an acorn drop?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If they thought they smelled fentanyl, they would have a seizure and pass out. Fentanyl doesn’t affect cops the way it affects human beings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Killing and barring entrance are very different. Security clearances and need are big factors

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

Why would the secret service be guarding an empty plane?

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

To prevent things like bombs being planted?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

TBF its the same SS that thought a shooter on a rooftop overlooking a candidate was no issue

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Vance is bombing big time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Isn’t that what regular security is for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

To prevent weirdos from wandering in and jerking off on the furniture?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

To prevent JD from fucking any couches in there?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 547K

    Comments