195 points

Why are they not talking about couches? What have they got to hide? Seems kinda suspicious.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

I agree. It seems like something you’d deny outright. It raises questions about whether or not Trump is a couch-fucker, or if MAGA republicans endorse couch-fucking. Is this their political agenda? To fuck my couch? Or your couch? Are they recruiting my furniture into their couch-fucking culture? There are a lot of questions here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Probably gonna need a congressional inquiry to get to the bottom of this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Don’t forget to check under the cushions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
  1. this their political agenda? To fuck my couch? Or your couch? Are they recruiting my furniture into their couch-fucking culture? There are a lot of questions here.

Given how they taped maxi pads to their ears or wore diapers, id absolutely believe they’d fuck couches to prove their dedication to the GOP. Republicans are nothing if not performative.

  1. It raises questions about whether or not Trump is a couch-fucker

I’d rather him fuck couches than be a rapist, but here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I found some instructional material that might be helpful to Vance

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Any day when the Epstein videos get released we will all have some videos of Vance properly using a couch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
119 points

This was just a silly joke that got WAY out of hand. The author isn’t even trying to claim it’s real. Getting defensive and angry is the worst possible way to respond - therefore, I hope they keep doing it.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

It would be something to see a headline about JD Vance denying having relations with a couch

Wonder if it’ll happen

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I did not have sexual relations with that couch

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I did not have sexual relations with that couch

I did not have sexual relations with that couch

I did not have sexual relations with that couch

I did not have sexual relations with that couch

I did not have sexual relations with that couch

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ couch, is”

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Not to completion, at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If this is genuine, I think we should accept him at his word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh god and they find out it was a new couch and JD has a thing for underage settees

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Could you imagine being the person that wrote that?!? Id take a drink of whatever just to do a spit take. “Omfg, I can’t believe it’s gone that far!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

You think fucking couches is a joke? Furniture abortions are at an all-time high and you think it’s some kind of silly joke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Come on. You and I both know that those stats are cushioned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There has been a steep recline in these numbers over the years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
108 points

“We do not want to risk Mr. Vance getting an erection on stage.”

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Interviewer: Please, take a seat

JD: Ummm, here? Really?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

But I just met it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And the couch is only 14 years old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s the thing, when you’re famous, they let you sit on them

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Oh please can we incept some weird mental link in his head between coaches and sex, I say send fan art

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Pretty sure republicans don’t have an issue with coaches and sex, just ask Gym Jordan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They had better not have any soft-cushioned chairs on there then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
105 points

You don’t have to talk to em, you just walk right up and grab em by the cushy

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Furnitussy

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Apparently, the only way to get under their skin is to sink down to their level a bit. It’s funny how much attention some of this stuff actually got. They are just so weird!

permalink
report
reply
49 points

It’s not even close to sinking to their level. This shit is harmless. That makes it especially hilarious to see them blow a gasket over something so lame. Trump wants to take his ball and go home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

No, convicted felon, and genuinely weird creepy Donald Trump, will take your ball and go home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That reminds me of a story of some business man who was playing at one of Trumps golf courses with his 12 year old son. Trump was right behind them and because he went with a golf cart he caught up with them. Now they had seen Trumps shot go in the bushes somewhere. You mark your golf balls so you know whose ball it is. Trump, undeterred, drove up with his golf cart, decided the best placed ball, the 12 yo kids, was his and continued playing with it to the absolute bafflement of the father and son.

Now this story is from way before he decided to go into politics, but already showed exactly what kind of person he is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

E. Jean Carroll already has the other one in a vice in her garage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I mean it’s just repeating a thing that isn’t true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Like someone sleeping their way to the top of the presidential ticket? We’ve been dealing with their bullshit rhetoric for years so much we are all but immune to it. The magat snowflakes can go fuck themselves if they can’t take some in turn now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It looks kind of pathetic. These dudes have real policy positions and behavior to attack and instead of anything substantive we get couches and weird.

If you’re trying to reach voters already with you, then it’ll be effective for that maybe, but it only tells other voters you think they’re imbeciles. Which is prolly accurate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

The talk about them being weird wasn’t devorced from policy. It was first brought up when talking about how republican leaders are weird for wanting book bans and abortion related policies

The media latched on to the word “weird” because it was unusual, but if you look at when Walz using it, it’s still largely being used in discussions of their horrible plans and actions

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

They latched onto it because they were told to by the DNC lol

There’s no way you believe that’s organic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

but it only tells other voters you think they’re imbeciles. Which is prolly accurate.

They’re trying to reach republican voters, of course they’re going to assume their target audience is a bunch of imbeciles who don’t care about policy. Because we have decades of evidence that they are a bunch of imbeciles who don’t care about policy.

You gotta meet your audience where they are, and we already know where the republican electorate is.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments