“We’re aware of reports that access to Signal has been blocked in some countries,” Signal says. If you are affected by the blocks, the company recommends turning on its censorship circumvention feature. (NetBlocks reports that this feature lets Signal “remain usable” in Russia.)

161 points

I take that as a compelling recommendation for Signal.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Agreed. Clearly it must do simply what is said on the tin, otherwise why ban it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You could also take it to mean that it’s compromised by the west.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Indeed… for example OTF (who is funded by US Congress) has provided funding for several large open source projects like Signal, Tor, F-Droid etc. and some have taken this to mean they might be compromised… but of course there’s no actual proof of that to my knowledge. And even in the linked article the author appears to use a bunch of half-truths and just straight up makes things up that don’t actually exist in the sources they say contain what he writes (example: OTF/Congress is not the CIA).

Personally I don’t have any suspicion or reason to believe they might be compromised, but if such proof ever did come around… I wouldn’t be surprised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You could. It depends on whose narration you trust

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

Legitimate countries don’t need to ban communications platforms.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Is tiktok ok?

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

He said “communications platforms” not “misinformation, social engineering, and mass data collection platform masquerading as a social media platform”

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

you can just say “social media.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I wish they would apply that standard universally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

🤡

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

not “misinformation, social engineering, and mass data collection platform masquerading as a social media platform”

Yeah and what do you think Russia for example sees almost every American “communiction platform” as? And it’s not as if they don’t have a reason, like every american platform that is every other major social media that isn’t tiktok is censored, controlled and swarming with bots doing narrative control and spam. It really is the height of arrogance and hypocrisy to say that TiKTok is the real pressing problem. I don’t even use TikTok, but I find it so fucking disgusting how every “freespeech freedomlover” comes out of the woodwork to demand it’s shutting it down just to enforce American social media monopoly over the world. Even if Bytedance has bent over backwards to prove that there isn’t any misconduct (of things that US based tech companies are routinely mandated to do for US gov, state department and the intelligence services), because it’s only bad if somebody else does the excact same thing to us as we would have done to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Does ByteDance publish TikTok’s transmission protocol to demonstrate transparency?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Protocol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Signal doesn’t even provide reproducible builds 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

bytedance offered the government unfettered access and moved their entire infrastructure to the united states; it was more transparent than anything else out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’d say social media platforms are an entire different beast.

Facebook is not the same as Facebook Messenger for instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

tiktok is a platform to share information and communicate, yes

which is why the french government banned it in Kanaky (“new caledonia”) during the protests there, as it was a tool of communication used by the protesters

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pro-independence Kanak parties use the name (la) Kanaky

TIL

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

probably not in anyway unless if bytedance strips the algorithm and sells it to like cloudflare, mozilla for example instead of facebook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I kinda disagree - that’s not to say that they don’t usually do so for illegitimate reasons (or that these bans are legitimate), but there’s plenty of valid reasons why a government would want/need to ban a platform

X, for example, has been giving the UK a whole lot of good reasons why they may wish to consider it (restoring the accounts of people like Tommy Robinson, allowing misinformation, the owner of the platform himself actively spreading that misinformation)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Poe’s Law

Do you really not see that this is literally just “we are the good guys so it is ok if we do it”?

“Misinformation” is whatever those in power decide to be such, whether it can be found on Signal or X or wherever, and whether the ones deciding it are in power in the UK, the US, India, Germany, Venezuela, or Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We should allow the US surveillance giants into all countries, and let US companies control all world social media and communications platforms. Signal too, since it’s a US-hosted centralized service that must follow its NSL laws /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I find these absolutist arguments particularly hilarious in face of UK now actively talking about restricting social media, and arresting people for posts. When people use media to incite violence and social unrest in countries the west considers to be adversaries, free speech stands above all other considerations. However, as soon as these things start happening in the west, then the restrictions on speech are immediately put into place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Worth highlighting that Telegram in Russia and WhatsApp in Venezuela - both with vastly larger user bases than Signal - are not blocked…

permalink
report
reply
26 points

But they are not as secure as Signal

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Believe that’s the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

For sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The session keys for WhatsApp are stored on Meta servers, so the encryption is meaningless. Meta can read everything everyone types. Yet all of the eastern hemisphere seem to worship it like it’s pure platinum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think anyone took those seriously as private messengers. On another note, I think Maduro cracked down on WhatsApp as well, and called Venezuelans to cancel Meta altogether. Or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

WhatsApp is the most popular messenger in Russia, not Telegram.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Just turn on the censorship intervention feature

based

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Fetch

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

That’s a glowing recommendation of Signal. And a good reminder to donate. I’m doing it right now.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Friendly reminder that Signal on Android contains proprietary code (google play services), and the server software is rumored to be closed now and/or not what they are actually using due to a lack of updates for a prolonged period. Of course it’s just a rumor and I have no way to verify that, but thought it was worth mentioning (hope this doesn’t count as FUD).

Molly-FOSS seems to be the preferred 100% open mobile alternative client.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.6K

    Posts

  • 41K

    Comments

Community moderators