As wildly different as Harris and Trump are, their campaigns seem to share a degree of indifference to the specifics of what their candidates are saying, because both campaigns realize that many of their voters are unconcerned about such details—or, at the very least, are unlikely to be moved by them. What matters to many voters right now is their hatred and fear, however justified, of the opposing candidate, and the fun they have calling the other side weird, dangerous, and deranged.
Paywall removed: https://archive.is/DQNOH
New Yorker - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for New Yorker:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Search topics on Ground.News
https://www.newyorker.com/news/fault-lines/how-generic-can-kamala-harris-be
Remember when presidential candidates used to run on policies?
I remember plenty of presidential candidates who lost by running on policy, most recently Hillary Clinton.
Obama (and for that matter Reagan) won because they inspired people, not because they were policy wonks.
How transparent can return2ozma be?
Kamala is up against Trump. Running on vibes is not enough. It will start to fade. Earn the votes harder.
maybe there will be something specific -
Harris also expressed support for raising the federal minimum wage. She told reporters earlier today that she would release her policy platform next week, with a focus on the economy and on lowering costs for working families.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/10/us/harris-trump-election
ITT: Disinformation/influencer shills… take note.
Don’t listen to people on the internet about political opinions