611

Fuck-up Assessment Form(sh.itjust.works)

posted
by
Avatar
0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works
in
Avatar
linuxmemes@lemmy.world
62 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
Avatar
Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
110 points

For a second I thought that the first field was:

IRL nickname: I don’t use IRL

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
24 points

Nobody should use IRL, it sucks and is way too humid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world
12 points

Floridean detected

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
64 points

h–how did you manage that

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
43 points

What’s wrong with btrfs?

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
°˖✧ ipha ✧˖°@lemm.ee
70 points

This is a rather old form and in its early days btrfs was not very stable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
19 points

People don’t know how CoW FSes work 🤷.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
9 points

My only gripe with btrfs is that I’ve had systems come down from a single drive failure in raid quite “often” when compared to other FS.

ZFS is a ram hog but I always could do a live resilvering without downtime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
hersh@literature.cafe
1 point

btrfs’s RAID features are not production-ready, and at this point I doubt they ever will be. See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#Implemented_but_not_recommended_for_production_use

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Btrfs-Warning-RAID5-RAID6

ZFS is definitely more robust.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
2 points

Raid 1 is stable. The problem is that btrfs has performance issues with resilvering a large amount of data. That isn’t something that can be fixed as it is a design flaw.

Maybe bcachfs will be production ready at some point

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
2 points

It is true for raid 5 & 6. Raid 0, 1, and 10 are supposed to be production ready. I use raid 10 only with btrfs, anything else and I use zfs or mdadm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
BCsven@lemmy.ca
1 point

You have to avoid the raid types is lists as not ready. Looks like facebook uses btrfs without issues

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Hupf@feddit.org
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
felsiq@lemmy.zip
5 points

I don’t think I’d call it anything wrong, but the subvolumes definitely do make it different for installation purposes so that following ext4 instructions for bootloader configs or kernel arguments could put you on the wrong path

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
5 points

Nothing these days

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
0 points
*

performance

opening programs was noticeably slower for me

benchmarks confirm this, and I think this is an aspect not discussed often enough

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
1 point

I benchmarked it and it blew XFS out of the water

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
28 points

Fucking Allan, always fucking shit up.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
Ignotum@lemmy.world
5 points

I liked using Arch, but i got tired of Allan breaking into my house and bricking my computers all the time, so i ended up switching

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
allan@lemmy.world
4 points

😬

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
4 points

All we wanted was some detail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
peanutyam@lemmy.world
24 points

That’s funny and sadly accurate 🤣

permalink
report
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 66K

    Comments

Community moderators