You can lead a horse to water and, it turns out, convince it to drink if the reward is great enough, researchers have found.

A new study has suggested horses are more intelligent than previously thought, having been observed to quickly adapt to a treat-based game with changing rules.

Researchers from Nottingham Trent University (NTU) said they were surprised by how the horses quickly grasped the game, busting previous theories that equine brains respond only to immediate stimuli and are not complex enough to strategise.

“This teaches us that we shouldn’t make assumptions about animal intelligence or sentience based on whether they are ‘built’ just like us,” she said.

33 points

previous theories that equine brains respond only to immediate stimuli and are not complex enough to strategise

Who held those theories? And have they ever been around horses?

Just this weekend my spouse and I had to move our mare and almost 4 month old colt. She’s quite used to riding in a small horse trailer, but the little guy was terrified of getting into it. When his mom realized it, she started getting on and off the trailer several times to show him it was fine. Then she went behind him and kept nudging him towards the trailer. Seemed pretty obvious to me that she knew what was going on and was trying her best to help the little guy understand it was all ok.

I’ve certainly met some horses that could have made me question the species’ intelligence if they were the only ones I knew. But there are plenty of intelligent horses out there. I’m really surprised that the prevailing theory was that they only respond to immediate stimuli.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I sent this article to my wife who trains / rides horses daily and she was just like, “Duh.”

She says anyone who has spent any time with horses knows this.

I guess a formal study proving something has some clout though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The arrogance of our species is quite astonishing. Look at the morons who get offended at the idea that we’re evolved apes.

Obviously, nothing could have any amount of actual thought if it wasn’t human! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Honestly I would’ve guessed that on size alone. Its generally a characteristic of anything bigger than a fruit fly, and especially mammals and birds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mammals and birds, yeah, but reptiles and fish are dehydrated rock-hard stupid. They just don’t have the brain structures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We had a stallion that could jump the 6-foot fences of his corral. My dad would yell at him and he would jump back in. He was a bit of a jerk (stallion), but he definitely wasn’t stupid.

We had a Shetland mare, and she wasn’t stupid, either. Pure evil, as is the Shetland way, but not stupid.

Our Welsh was neither stupid nor evil.

Our thoroughbred might have been stupid, or could have come from an environment as unstimulating as a rat cage with nothing but food and a single wheel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah some horses are super smart. I had one that learned to open doorknobs with his mouth after seeing it used up close for a long time. Very annoying, had to start locking that barn door.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Great, so now in addition to being big enough to kick me to death they can now plan how they’re gonna get away with it.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

“Now explain the getaway plan, Carl.”

“I’m thinking… We have 4 feet and can travel at the speed of a galloping horse.”

“Oats, Carl. Where are we going to find oats?”

“I’ve stashed a bunch away in the corner of the barn.”

munch munch hard swallow The uh… corner you say?”

“God dammit, Applebottom! Farmer Bill lives, for now…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I am constantly surprised by how often you get reports of “animal such and such is capable of basic task”.

I would assume it’s a case of misreporting technical information, but then you hear how entrenched some professionals on the field are when it comes to assuming some type of exceptional, unique magical property in human brains and how “antropomorphizing” is used as a dirty word and it makes you wonder. I once had a biologist get very angry at me for suggesting dogs are capable of play behavior, so all bets are off, I guess?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

That biologist has never seen juvenile animals of any sort then … because they all play in their own manner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If I remember correctly, play in both juvenile animals and humans is primarily about practicing for adulthood in all sorts of ways. Making it enjoyable is obviously of an evolutionary benefit. Like you said- puppies clearly enjoy playing, as do adult dogs since they have been bred to retain juvenile wolf features, and wolf pups also enjoy playing, but stop when they become adults.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Horses are treated pretty poorly during training, many trainers assume horses don’t have any conscious functioning, like their dog for example

permalink
report
reply
4 points

…dogs have conscious functioning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

so many of these behaviors are in so many animals but we can’t say with any degree of confidence till a study is done. I have seen squirrels strategize.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 465K

    Comments