Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to arrange a meeting with Vice President Kamala Harris to secure a place in her administration or a cabinet post in exchange for an endorsement, according to multiple reports.

The Washington Post first reported that Kennedy made the overture through intermediaries, just weeks after he proposed as similar arrangement to former President Donald Trump after the Republican National Convention last month. The pair spoke about the plan, but did not reach an agreement on the matter.

Harris has not responded with an offer to meet and her campaign has expressed no interest to do so, the Post added.

-5 points
Huffington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Huffington Post:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Washington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Washington Post:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/22/rfk-jr-floated-job-trump-white-house-he-weighed-endorsing-trump/
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/robert-f-kennedy-jr-kamala-harris-cabinet_n_66bd9f02e4b03da4fc0221b9
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/14/rfk-jr-kamala-harris-cabinet-trump/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
127 points

… and why should they talk with RFK? He’s a spoiler candidate. He’s literally holding them hostage to the votes he thinks he’s going to pull from their campaign to get a seat at the table, and he’s so freaking incompetent, he doesn’t even realiz e that he’s pulling votes from the republican weirdos rather than Democrats.

permalink
report
reply
92 points

He’s trying this with both campaigns though. He is just a slimy, opportunistic douche.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Yeah but is it working on any Democrats? I just don’t see him pulling votes from anyone but Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

When Biden was still running RFK appealed to some voters as a more youthful alternative. The Kennedy name recognition also goes a really long way.

Generally the more people learn about him the less they like him, and Harris becoming the nominee pulled back a lot of the “he’s too old” voters. So RFK’s voter base draws more from Republicans than Democrats now. But it used to be more evenly split.

Additionally, there are still some Democrats (or Dem leaning independents) who like RFK’s antivax nonsense. Before Republicans elevated antivax theories to the party’s platform in 2016, that used to be something most commonly associated with the fringes of liberal communities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It was while biden was still the candidate. When kamala swapped in, rfk went from 15% to 7%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mean… The guy knows he isn’t gonna be president. Can’t blame him for trying to line up a job after its all over. And he’s a slimy opportunistic douche.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree 100%. However, think about what would happen in the political arena if he were given a position in exchange for endorsing kamala. We all know that many right wingers who don’t like trump are RFKs primary supporters. Him supporting kamala would throw this group into a tailspin.

It ain’t gonna happen, just sayin’ it would be very interesting to watch. A big worry would be his supporters getting pissed and then swinging towards trump.

Still, I’d love to see it for the lulz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Fun fact he actually lost more than half of his support when kamala became the candidate. He was potentially spoiling for biden, but now he’s almost exclusively a hindrance to trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

It would seem the response he received was not definitively obvious to him prior to asking. I feel this is the most shocking part. It’s like he’s out of touch with reality.

But if I may shitpost:

Maybe it’s high time he cleaned out all those animal carcasses from his freezer.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I don’t think it’s shitposting when that’s literally how politics works these days. You’ve just become a spokesman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Please no, Central Park doesn’t need a pile of rotting animal corpses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-53 points

But Gaza women & children need more bombs? Seriously, why are Democrats so hypocritical these days? Like… RFK Jr. may have done some looney shit but Democrats have literally enabled killing tens of thousand women & children and that is acceptable to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Democrats? Why on Earth would you blame the Dems when it’s more than clear that it’s the GOP that is latched onto the AIPAC teat like a barnacle. Remember when Republicans in the House and Senate were demanding aid for Ukraine go to Israel instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

RFK Jr. wants to send more bombs to Gaza and he has also contributed to plenty of preventable deaths with his years of spreading antivaccination disinformation.

His remarks on leveling Gaza are in the first result I found when I looked up his stance on Israel: https://www.timesofisrael.com/2024-dark-horse-rfk-jr-questions-gaza-ceasefire-defends-israeli-offensive/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What on earth… I was making a playful joke about him leaving a bear corpse in Central Park…

A little hard for me to be a Democrat when I’m not even American you manic buffoon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Despite his earlier proclaimed “anti-war” position RFK is a Zionist and fully supports the Genocide in Gaza.

He might have had a real shot at winning the election if he provided an anti-Genocide alternative. But the so called “anti-war” guy just had to kneel for israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s almost like parasitic worms ate a part of his brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

Remember when he supported and backed Obama, or when he threw support behind Hillary? Or that he was a registered Democrat? Or when Obama considered him for administrator of the EPA?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

No, because he’s always been a human disease vector with nepo-brain (now with worms!).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s like he’s out of touch with reality.

He’s an aging second generation Kennedy who had a brain worm…

They don’t remove those btw, they’re usually killed via medications but the worm is in an organ, you can’t remove it. Like if a dog has heart worms and gets treated, their health will get worse because their body has to deal with dead worms, and then even after the remains decay, there’s holes.

Like, dude probably already put his brain thru enough without a decaying worm, but it shouldn’t be surprising he acts illogical like he has a serious mental problem, because he has a serious mental problem. Absolute best case scenario is by now the worm is gone and he “just” has a big hole in his brain that will never heal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Was it his doing or worm’s?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

They’re one and the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“I’m willing to meet with leaders of both parties to discuss the possibility of a unity government," Kennedy told the Post.

What…? A unity government…? Unity with who? RFK’s literal brainworm?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Try to have some empathy. That poor brain eating worm starved to death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

My apologies - I did not mean to offend or denigrate the suffering of his brainworm.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 451K

    Comments