12 points

In addition to Neanderthals and Denisovans we also know that we have trace amounts of another cousin that we have yet to identify.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Your mom knows which cousin, but she ain’t gonna tell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Cousin Eddie has entered the chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

First out-loud laugh of the day. Awesome response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

it’s cousin Lenny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

But we don’t talk about that side of the family.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They always tell us we have yet to discover them but we all know we’d all like to forget they exist

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

But remember, we’re all, exactly, totally, completely the same… and to suggest that some lineages might have traits that others don’t is wrong.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

No one has ever suggested that. We suggest — and I’ll just say it clearly rather than suggest — that people who talk about “races” made up in like 1600, people who cite IQ tests, and people who show their whole ignorant, racist ass online are the fucking morons. Maybe they should show a little humility about their wack ass genetic inheritance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

There’s no real scientific basis of there being such a thing as a “race”. There’s many more sub-phenotypes of homo sapien than there are “races”. Hell, in Africa alone there are something like 14 edit: 13 (sorry, had to fact check myself there) major, distinct genetic groups [1]. Many of the major pacific islands also have distinct genetic lineage; so much so that they can be reliably grouped into which island they originated from. “Race” is far too broad of a term and wholly unscientific; it should be broken down in a far more granular fashion. (in my opinion the benefit of this being that it’s unlikely to be worth it to racists to remember all the groups they’re trying to hate)

The comment was a poke at the people (like yourself) who always jump to the conclusion you’ve jumped to; as well as the scientists who constantly walk on egg shells to avoid any topic like intelligence, because they will be roasted alive by hypersensitive people who are just looking for someone to attack. So their findings, and their reports are chastised in order to fit that particular nuance of our society.

Additionally, the reason I think we should stop shying away from distinctly organizing these genetic groups, is because in lots of cases of medical research, these genetic lineages aren’t being taken into account. Many drugs work differently on West-European patients than they do on East-Asian patients; or have different efficacy. These things need to be taken into account if we’re ever going to create the right medicine for the right people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s worth noting that distinct lineages only really happen where there is reproductive isolation and that especially in the modern world no one has a “pure” lineage. Instead you have genetic composition that might have a larger influence from one ancestral population over an other.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments