What’s their excuse?
Laziness
I think it’s more laziness. If they were greedy they would charge for ipv6.
literally just too lazy, nobody is asking for it and at a small or medium scale probably no cost benefit to them besides future readiness
Yeah same.
Those who do and use Winblows, don’t ignore your patches. Especially if using any kind of public wifi, definitely if you port forward for any reason or have any P2P software running that might’ve done UPnP… Just a mess.
Adding IPv6 would cost them money. Probably a relatively small amount of money, but still money. They get nothing from that investment. As long as they have IPv4 addresses to assign to their customers, there’s basically no demand for IPv6 addresses. NAT and UPnP work fine for just about everyone. I think the only way we see serious IPv6 adoption in North America and Europe is government mandates.
It’s not working fine for me! I need a static address and they quoted me $200/mo for an IPv4 one.
DDNS doesn’t work behind CGNAT. Never heard of ngrok; google says it might work. I’m trying to do something with WireGuard.
It could be equipment related?
I have municipal fiber and used to have ipv6 before they came out and swapped out my little modem for this fiber to ethernet converter box. Now I get no ipv6 anymore
I think all networking equipment built within the past twenty-five years has both IPv4 and IPv6 built-in.
