74 points
*

Literally just sat and benefitted from the hype to get some sales, then shat all over everything right before people actually start having fun.

Nevermind that if it went live, likely would have meant even more sales.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I really hope those people will refund the game. Won’t hurt Activision much, but every bit counts

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I haven’t forked over any $$ to Activision in over a decade, I see no reason to ever change my stance. I don’t feel like I’m missing out either, I simply cannot understand why this franchise ever got as popular as it is, let alone why it remains so popular today. A fool and his money…

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

I haven’t bought a video game in years. It’s just been garbage after garbage. The market is saturated with so much shit that I don’t even care to play games anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I mean, some of the best games of all time (imo) have released in the last 3 years. Not sure what you’re on about with all games being garbage nowadays

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sorry, when I say good games I mean games that I find to be good. There have been games that are popular that I have no interest in. I also find games to be too expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Actually RDR2 came out nearly 6 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If you don’t play games why are you in this community? What do you think your perspective adds to this conversation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not that I don’t play games

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

really re-enforcing the fact that I will never buy a COD game again. It’s not like they used to be and it looks like it’s intentional at this point.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Activision cementing that they are the only ones who can release the same game every year.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Is someone well versed enough in law to explain why Activision can do this? If the mod requires the software to be purchased and only uses resources present in the owned game - wouldn’t that be fair to use, so long as it’s not sold? Or is this just a case of Activision has the big stick and a small dev team knows they have no shot in fighting Activision’s lawyers without going broke?

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

Fair use is determined in a court. If somebody sues you, you can’t just say “Nah actually it’s fair use” and then not show up to court.

The C&D letter wasn’t a lawsuit yet, but a warning that one would be coming. The mod team had the choice of complying or going to court, which costs time and money. In court, even if they ended up winning, it’s not guaranteed that the dev team would be granted legal fees. Atop that, who wants to spend the next few months to years stressing on a court fight?

It’s an unfortunately lopsided situation where a C&D is enough to make most small time projects fold at the prospect of even having to go to court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Thank you, makes perfect sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 79K

    Comments