DONALD TRUMP SAID he “absolutely” plans to testify in the federal government’s case against him regarding classified documents he removed from the White House. “I’m allowed to do whatever I want … I’m allowed to do everything I did,” the former president told conservative podcast host Hugh Hewitt.

In an interview on “The Hugh Hewitt Show” that dropped Wednesday, the host asked Trump, “Did you direct anyone to move the boxes, Mr. President? Did you tell anyone to move the boxes?” referring to the boxes of more than 300 classified documents the federal government seized last year from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

“I don’t talk about anything. You know why? Because I’m allowed to do whatever I want. I come under the Presidential Records Act,” Trump replied, while also taking a quick detour to bash Hewitt. “I’m not telling you. You know, every time I talk to you, ‘Oh, I have a breaking story.’ You don’t have any story. I come under the Presidential Records Act. I’m allowed to do everything I did.”

110 points

Will be super interesting to see him try that under oath…

permalink
report
reply
75 points

“OBJECTION YOUR HONOR. My client is a moron and just incriminated himself.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

“Your honor, I object!”

“And why is that?”

“Because it’s devastating to my case!”

https://youtu.be/Dx32b5igLwA

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

“Overruled.”

“Good call.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/Dx32b5igLwA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

His lawyers actually said that while he was president. They said he was incapable of being deposed without perjuring himself. Eventually they sent 10 questions written out and he had his lawyers with him to help respond.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They said he was incapable of being deposed without perjuring himself.

“Perjury trap” is a fake term that tries to place the blame for “My client is a compulsive liar and literally can’t tell the truth to save his life” on the other party. And whoever came up with the term deserves both a raise for being amazing at their job, and a knee to the groin for being a shit human being.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I cannot imagine the guy speaking a single word in court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I can def see a man-child reaction exactly like this dumb statement -kinda like what he did on the debates with Hillary and Biden, interrupting and interjecting his sad alternate reality- as the cases pick up steam and hes forced to fly between Fla, DC, Ga and wherever his current cult rally/grievance is that day, oh boy, is it gonna be fun or what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thing is, neither a man-child reaction, nor making deranged statements, helps you in court. So, I’m imagining his lawyers will instruct him to please shut the hell up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I could see him yelling and screaming as they take him away.

https://youtu.be/sA0glbG6c-8#t=48s

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh yeah, after the verdict, I can imagine him inciting another coup and whatnot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/sA0glbG6c-8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can.

And it almost is a replacement for PornHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It would make for a much shorter trial, at least. Basically just a guilty plea with extra steps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It seems like he is showing what his defense will be. It won’t be whether he moved documents or shared confidential information or whatever. It will be them challenging the scope of power of the presidency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

The defense comes down to the Afluenza Defense. Note, to my knowledge that never really worked before.

He keeps repeating he thinks he’s allowed to do all these things and even when found in court he isn’t allowed to do those things, they’ll try to say he didn’t know.

Thing is, he’s playing dumb now, while he’s repeatedly shown he knows full well what’s right and what’s wrong, his statements like how he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and no one would do anything about it, or the grab em by the pussy line.

He made statements showing he knows perfectly fine these are things one shouldn’t do, but he does them anyway as he was never held responsible and could get away with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Except in the cases of Brock Turner, the convicted rapist and Ethan Couch, the teen who killed 4 people driving drunk and only served 2 years in prison.

And then there’s all the deferred sentence stuff that practically every white collar criminal gets to stay rich and out of prison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not really the scope of power so much as destroying Trump’s delusional interpretation of the Presidential Record’s Act.

If he honestly tries that in court he’s going to get “Um, actually” lawyer-splained so fast BARRON’S kid’s heads will spin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

I like a petulant Trump. Means he’s worried.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

He’s always been petulant though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Which makes sense given his constant state of anxiety about whatever demographic, real or imagined, is supposedly after him for no good reason next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There is only one person trying to take down Trump and that is Donald Trump. He’s absolutely his own worst enemy because he doesn’t ever think.

The speech centres of his brain appear to be directly wired to his mouth without reference to the critical thinking or self-preservation lobes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

He can in fact do whatever he wants, he just needs to deal with the consequences of his actions.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I don’t see proof of that last part for the moment, hopefully it will become true

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, technically, no consequences are some kind of consequences. But I really do hope that he will pay for what he did wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Candidate Trump needs to be belligerent and defiant. Defendant Trump needs to STFU.

The problem is those two things are in competition. So he has to say, Russia, Russia, Russia as candidate Trump, but that isn’t a relevant or useful argument for defendant Trump. He has to say, “I’m allowed to do this thing” as candidate Trump, but as defendant Trump, I’m allowed to break the law is not a defense.

His only hope is to delay. If he goes to trial on anything, defendant Trump loses. If he can hold out, then candidate Trump will win.

This is his bet. He wins and it all goes away and the US is ruled by a guy who believes he can get away with anything.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Maybe we get lucky and he has a cheeseburger embolism between now and then and then Walter Reed docs just choose to try a little less hard that day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

If I was a Republican, and I fancied myself a man of wit, accountability, and maturity, I would not be able to reconcile my politics against just how absurdly juvenile, idiotic, and whiny Trump is at all times.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yes, but what if they make you hate the others more than this mob?

That, and “eh, they’re all the same”, and when you need to support the team no matter what - can lull your critical faculties quite well.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments