Author J.K. Rowling has fallen silent on her usually busy X (formerly Twitter) feed, after Olympic gold medalist boxer Imane Khelif filed a legal complaint in France for alleged cyber harassment over statements regarding her gender.

On August 9, lawyers for Khelif filed a lawsuit with a special unit of the public prosecutor’s office in Paris, stemming from false statements that spread online about her gender after the Algerian boxer defeated Italy’s Angela Carini in her first fight of the 2024 Olympic Games. Carini pulled out 46 seconds into the bout and told reporters afterwards that she had “never felt a punch like this.”

-31 points
Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Newsweek:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.newsweek.com/topic/j.k.-rowling
https://www.newsweek.com/jk-rowling-imane-khelif-donald-trump-elon-musk-lawsuit-1940241
https://www.newsweek.com/topic/twitter

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
-41 points

Incredibly interesting that as soon as MBFC posts about a right wing site everyone stops downvoting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

This is a leftist echo chamber, I have no idea what you mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Oh no, reality has a left-leaning bias. We must change reality!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What lack of downvotes? I don’t see one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Was at a solid zero when I commented.

permalink
report
parent
reply
309 points

Oh no, consequences.

permalink
report
reply
172 points

Only because she attacked a cis woman. No consequences from the years doing everything in her power to targetedly harass individual trans peolle, the community as a whole or publishing books about trans serial killers.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy to see her go quite, I hope she stays that way. But I’m bitter it wasn’t a realization that her crusade was mysgonstic hatred, only that she was a zealot who accidently friendly fired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

This isn’t friendly fire. TERFism is inherently white supremacist and Khelif was targeted for her race.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

I abundetly agree that is correct. But I am doing my best to try to think of her personal viewpoint, in JK’s mind she is defending women from men. Hell, her stupid books are a racist allegory for how evil racism is, but when she gets praised from literaly white supramcists and dictarors, she makes excuses for being the greater good.

It’s only when from her twisted perspective, she (for the first time) attacked an “actual woman”, that she is finally giving pause. JK thinks she is feminist even if all she has done in actuality is outright misogyny. Which is why I am so frustrated, she didn’t wake up to what a monster she has been, just that she needs to be more careful in who she “righteously” attacks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Don’t forget it’s also inherently misogynistic and attacks cis women all the time anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not arguing, but how is TERFism white supremacy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s the start, the lawsuit has more chance to win that way, and can pave a path for trans people to win cyberbullying lawsuits too

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

only that she was a zealot who accidently friendly fired.

Bigotry is illogical, and will always ‘friendly fire’. No one is ever safe. People have transvestigated Joanne Koanne Roanne and Andrew Tate. No one is ever safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

tbf tho Tate is a little manlet. I am in disbelief that anyone takes their cues on traditional masculinity from him. Guy with a face like that, he should be preaching the virtues of open mindedness and tolerance. If he was, I’d respect his masculinity. But since he demands that men be judged for failing to embody masculinity, I’m happy to treat him as he wishes to be treated and conclude he is a tiny soyboy with a pathetic chin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Is Rowling even subject to French legal proceedings?

permalink
report
reply
31 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

The harassment lawsuit alleges “aggravated cyber-harassment” against Khelif, according to a statement from the boxer’s lawyer, Nabil Boudi, who was quoted by The Associated Press. Variety reported that the complaint was filed against X, which means under French law that it was filed against unknown persons. Investigators at the Paris prosecutor’s office will determine who could be at fault in Khelif’s complaint.

If she ends up being found liable in an EU country, I bet she won’t be able to travel to any EU country without facing that liability. X is an international platform, and she’s broadcasting her words internationally, so yes, she can be held accountable in countries where this carries civil or criminal liability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

Also any EU royalty payments could be garnished until her debt from her liability is paid in full.

With the sales numbers of Harry Potter stuff, i doubt there will be a problem of securing the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I imagine that her Harry Potter stuff is owned by a corporation. That is probably all separate legally from her.

So her Harry Potter stuff is probably fine as she is getting sued not the Harry Potter corporation.

It will mainly affect her ability to travel around Europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Well at the very least it could block her from going to France? Which as a rich British middle-aged woman I’m sure she would hate not being able to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
163 points

It’s about fucking time someone shut her up

permalink
report
reply
9 points

FAFO

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 519K

    Comments