167 points

I mentioned this in another thread, but this only applies to their “Team Pixel” ambassador program. Those aren’t actual reviewers, they’re contracted by Google’s PR firm, specifically to promote their product line. They’re not coming after MKBHD and the likes with this. This is just part of their sponsorship agreement.

Worst case scenario in this situation is a few lifestyle vloggers will stop getting free phones.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

The second half of the article goes into that a bit. Seems like some reviewers were also grouped into that program before, and the terms weren’t like this before.

The Verge spoke with other independent reviewers and freelance tech journalists who say that they were grouped into the Team Pixel program for review units in the past. For those in the latter group, the new stipulation is a threat to their integrity and livelihood. Matlock says he’s since quit the Team Pixel program over the new terms.

YouTuber Kevin Nether, who runs The Tech Ninja channel, also says the clause led him to quit the Team Pixel program. “As someone who reviews technology for a living, I work with many brands. To be cornered into using one product — that doesn’t work for me, and that’s nothing I want to participate in.”

Nether echoes that he’s never seen this kind of stipulation in previous Team Pixel surveys. Usually, he says, the survey gauges a creator’s interest in various topics, like sports or fashion, to identify areas for collaboration. In the past, he says he’s made it clear to Team Pixel representatives that outside an obligatory post, he will review the device as normal. Nether also says this exclusivity term is atypical. Usually, when brands demand exclusivity from creators or brand ambassadors, they’ll offer payment, have clear disclosure rules, and have limited timelines.

Either Google changed the focus of the program, or the intent wasn’t clear enough in previous years

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Either Google changed the focus of the program, or the intent wasn’t clear enough in previous years

I dunno, I got invited to it and I read through the application forms, which looked very similar to the ones they’re posting screenshots of now. Back when I first looked at it a few years ago, it seemed pretty clear that the whole deal was “we’ll give you free phones if you advertise us to your community”. The application process focused very heavily on determining what sort of following the applicant has, how receptive they are to calls to action, etc.

As far as I can tell, the only thing that’s changed is that Google is saying the quiet part out loud, which I would imagine is because a member likely bad-mouthed the product and raised a stink about getting cut off from the freebies. Not to sound victim-blamey, but if anybody in this programed was disillusioned into thinking it was anything short of “be our unpaid advertising monkeys”, then they must not have even taken a cursory glance at the description before signing up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Thank you for sharing that information.

Then it really does seems like some reviewers were just entering the grey zone willingly, to get phones intended for advertisements and used them for reviews anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Click bait title for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

The only reason I am buying Pixel devices is the amazing third party os / rom support (especially GrapheneOS).

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Same. I don’t care about the camera or AI features, the speakers could be louder, and a few other nitpicks, but it supports GrapheneOS, has a long SW support cycle, and has some great security hardware, so I bought one. I actually kind of prefer my older, crappy Moto phone in some ways, but I’m unwilling to use an insecure device, and ROMs aren’t supported (well, I guess I could sign an abusive agreement).

So yeah, Pixel wins for me because of GOS and longer SW support. That’s honestly it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You could try the fairphone

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I could, but I’m in the US, and only the Fairphone 4 seems to be available, and that has limited updates left. I’m also not sold on /e/OS, but it’s probably fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Could give the fairphone a try

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Too expensive for the hardware provided in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You definitely pay a premium for repairability and ethics, but IMO it’s worth it. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

The Option to install Graphene OS onto the Pixel do be a very good argument for it.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’ll always be distrustful of Google hardware, but yes. I’ve been considering a Pixel as my next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

GOS is still not for everyone.

edit: less offensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

So because it’s not literally for everyone, nobody can share an opinion about it?

Weird take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

So just because my car has the ability to tow a trailer it is bad? The pixel gives everyone that wants to the possibility to install a custom ROM, which is great because not every phone allows this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah that’s what has put me off getting a new Samsung phone as a free upgrade even though they have better specs. They all have the stupid Snapdragon processors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

Tech reviews are a corrupt mess and can seldom be trusted, especially reviews by “influencers”.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Also these days it’s all about rushing content and pandering to the lowest common denominator. Though pop tech channels were always this way. I stumbled on Unbox Therapy lately and it’s so blatant that it almost feels illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Hey Google, this makes me not want a Pixel. I will however accept a large $um to cea$e $haring that $entiment.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments