Beginner question: Searching for my first dedicated server setup, and I have no idea what to look for in a hard drive. I see a huge difference between drives of the same capacity, so what makes the difference? I am looking to eventually have a media server that can run “-arr” programs, Jellyfin, Immich, sync music, books, etc.

What are the factors I should be paying attention to other than capacity? Is it a lot of branding and smoke and mirrors, or will I see a significant change in performance/reliability with different drives?

12 points

Rpm is a thing to look at. A 7,200 drive is faster than a 4,200, but slower than a 10,000.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

jots down notes

Uh huh, uh huh, uh huh, numbers…in…ascending…order.

Got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Sorry, RPM is rotations per minute. How fast the drive platers are spinning inside the drive. Also 7200 is fine for what you are doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

One thing to consider here too is that faster drives are louder, run hotter (and thus need better cooling) and use more power.

For a LOT of home server workloads (streaming media, etc.) a 5400rpm drive is sufficient and you can have a little bit of power savings and less heat and noise as a bonus.

I’ve kinda become of the opinion that there’s bulk media storage, which for most people is going to have incredibly modest performance requirements, and then there’s eveything else and should be on a SSD anyways.

…Just avoid SMR if you’re doing anything more than media storage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

God avoid SMR… (Unless you know what you’re doing in which case you wouldn’t be here)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

10,000 and 15,000 rpm drives were made obsolete by SSDs and were discontinued several years ago. They are slower than many modern 7,200 rpm drives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As someone that works at a storage devices company - we do still manufacture 10K HDDs. They are faster than the 7200s of the same spec, by nature. All 2.5” drives for enterprise systems. And will actually continue selling them until ~2030. That said, they’re all but obsolete at this point, and aren’t really being developed on any more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

And cache

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Also pay attention to SAS vs SATA. SATA drives are usually usable in SAS backplanes, but a SAS drive physically will not fit a SATA connector.

Also avoid SMR drives. They’re very slow because their tracks are overlapping, so one write results in many writes to update the downstream sectors.

Other than that, just pick a big name like WD, Seagate, HGST and you’ll be fine. Just buy at least one spare to have on hand, and practice 3-2-1 backups for anything you can’t afford to lose.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Never use SMR drives for a RAID setup. But outside of RAID, they’re probably fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I wouldn’t use them for anything but a low-usage backup target. Or any disk that’s written to very rarely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There aren’t any non big name manufacturers left for harddrives. And if you have the time, consider buying with some separation to reduce the risk of hard drives failing at the same time due to age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

WD, Seagate

Has Seagate improved? After having multiple Seagate drives fail, I did some research on failure rates and Seagate was way worse than every other brand. Since then I have only been buying enterprise-grade WD drives. However, I did my research almost ten years ago and a lot could have changed since then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Any difference you personally experience between the three big brands is meaningless. For any failed HDD you have there’s going to be another person who swears by them and has had five of them running for 10 years without a hitch.

But whatever’s cheaper in your area and stop worrying. Your reliability should be assured by backups anyway not by betting on a single drive. Any drive can fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Backblaze regularly releases failure rate statistics of their drives, and it’s often a big enough dataset to be quite meaningful. I haven’t been keeping up with it lately, but there certainly was a period of time where there were substantial differences in the failure rates of different manufacturers.

So while you do still need to have drive failure mitigation strategies, buying more reliable devices can definitely save you time and headache in the future by having to deal with failures less frequently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not that Seagate improved (which it may have), it’s more that WD has noticeably declined. It’s not a race to the bottom (yet), but there’s effectively no competition any more, so they aren’t incentivised to improve quality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes, Seagate had a bad run of drives. But that was only certain models, and like you said, years ago. WD had a similar bad run after Seagate recovered, and currently they’re all roughly equivalent. But you can find Backblaze’s data somewhere if you want to read numbers.

Bottom line, there’s always a failure risk, just be prepared for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

150$, sorry

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I was gonna say I’ve never seen a price gap that wide

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You can buy a $400 900GB HDD, so OPs price gap is actually pretty narrow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Forget the price. I’ve never seen a 900GB drive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Warranty, usually

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Also reliability, speed, and quality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

About 150$

permalink
report
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 71K

    Comments