I’m using Signal, but after I found out that it’s not as privacy-friendly as it claims, I’m uneasy about sharing my address there. I trust the person who asked for my address, but not the service. What’s a safe way to share? I was thinking of something like a self-destructing pastebin, but surely you have better ideas.

38 points

Which of Signals privacy claims are false?

permalink
report
reply
-20 points

Pretty much everything about it is unverifiable, because its a centralized service and you ultimately don’t know what the server is running. Contrast that with self-hostable apps which must pass verifiability checks, because people can host their own instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Clients are open source. Independent clients exists and they work. So the server must kind of do what signal claims, otherwise those devs would notice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

You have no idea what the server is running. It has your phone number, ie your real name and address, and it knows who you sent messages to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

This is suspicion on the level of “you can’t be sure reality didn’t just pop into existence 10 seconds ago”. You can never be 100% sure of what others are doing on their hardware, or of anything really, especially if other people are involved. Your chat partners could leak all your chats and metadata for all you know!

What we do know is that Signal is operated by a non-profit foundation, their client and protocol are open source and considered the gold standard for privacy by pretty much every expert on the subject, they had multiple independent audits and a very good track record, they were subpoenaed and couldn’t comply because they didn’t have the requested data. That’s about as good as you can get.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Better use a cipher then for your pen and paper transmission. Invisible ink as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Matrix and even Signal you reject for some reason work fine with no one being able to see the content of your message except the one you sent it to.

permalink
report
reply
52 points
*

I’ve never heard anyone other than OP have any privacy concerns over Signal. Their encryption method is rock-solid, and they win the award for best response to a government subpoena

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Signal is trustworthy

permalink
report
reply
15 points
6 points

I have been using bw for years and never occurred to me to click on send. I thought it was for sharing passwords or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I mean it can be. You can put anything you want there and send it on it’s way

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I guess you can use wormhole to transport the data to your peer, and if you’re extra paranoid encrypt it asymmetrically with something like age.

Then again you can just encrypt it with age and send it over Signal. There should be no risk involved in sharing public keys even if you don’t trust their servers.

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.9K

    Posts

  • 275K

    Comments