32 points

Critic reviews in video gaming are literally just corporate advertising. It’s not surprising critics like a game with Disney behind it.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I noticed this. I was thinking in my head that critics means they usually be critical but a lot of the times it just feels like an ad with these big studios. I loved game informer tho, but unfortunately it got shut down this year and now I have no reliable site to check :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’m surprised to see generally positive reviews given just how entirely Mid the previews all looked.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Starfield was the same. Looked pretty meh, but almost all (initial) reviewers gave it high marks. It wasn’t until people started playing that the truthful reviews surfaced. Guessing either paid reviews, or reviewers having a skewed view of what makes a game great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Apparently for lots oft publications (and people in general) it’s impossible to rate anything below 7

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

7 for effort.

8 if it’s executed well.

9 and up if it’s actually a creative and fun game with good mechanics, no MTX, etc.

It just makes the rating system pointless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Anything less than a 7 gets you blacklisted from publishers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This right here is why critic scores are almost always higher than audience scores. Becauee the audience doesn’t care about being blacklisted because they honestly scored a product.

Companies have a financial incentive to get high scores. Review outlets have a fincancial incentive to get review copies for free. Put two and two together and it really isn’t hard to see why the critics give whack scores.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Access journalism trends this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A lot of people that played the previews were quite optimistic about the game, save for a few gripes that seem to reflect in most reviews now. But the online community has been rather toxic about a variety of things, ranging from valid concerns to pointless hate. There was one IGN preview that looked pretty bland and bad, but everything else looked alright.

It’s not an innovating game, but frankly I never expected it to be. It looks like a fun immersive experience for SW fans (the actual fans, not the ones that hate literally everything about SW lol).

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I hate how fan now means mindless consumer these days and any reflecting on the criticisms of a series means you’re somehow excluded from being a fan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Have you seen the actual “criticism” lately? Like 99% of the stuff I’ve read from SW “fans” are anything but legit criticism, just trolls incessantly bitching for the sake of bitching in an attempt to raise their social media scores by lifting on the circlejerks just hating without any constructive feedback.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The one thing I hate is that it is from Ubisoft. Going from one boycotted trash company to the next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Didn’t Ubisoft or Disney send people to Disneyland and pay for vacations or whatever in connection with them being invited to play the game? In a legal context, that could easily be seen as veiled bribery. It psychologically makes people more inclined to speak positively because it abuses their desire to be grateful and show gratitude. Basically, a company that wants honest feedback would not do that. Especially not the company with a direct financial incentive to gain from the most expensive marketing campaign they have ever done.

All the gameplay I have seen looks mid at best, and bad at worst. Especially when comparing it to previous Ubisoft games such as AC Black Flag. Comparing AC Black Flag to Star Wars Outlaws demonstrates modern Ubisofts profound lack of attention to detail. Facial animations, water interactions, stealth, all of the major mechanics of the game demonstrate significant degradation in Outlaws’ gameplay footage.

These are criticisms purely based on the technical aspects of visible gameplay footage. This isn’t even touching stuff like story or writing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Remember when critics gave positive reviews to Overwatch 2? Yeah, this is that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I always thought it looked cool, I don’t see what was so “mid” about any of the previews.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ubisoft is behind it! I learned to walk away from these fuckers. They can release the perfect game and within 3 months it will be ruined.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Sometimes you can get a high sea release that does not get ruined by future updates if you like the current state of the game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Looks kinda promising but I need to wait for the real reviews.

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 79K

    Comments