Recently got some burritos from a food bank and while looking for cooking directions I found this nutrition chart. Never seen a food product use anything other than calories for energy, thought it was interesting.

1 point
*

Hot take: calories are the more intuitive energy unit. “How much energy it takes to heat 1 mL aka 1 g water 1°C” is more relatable than “how much energy it takes to move a 1 kg mass 1 m while accelerating that mass at 1 m/s/s”.

kcal = Cal is silly though

Side note: I know that the heating water thing is problematic because it depends on T, P, and purity (yay thermo), which is why these days cal is defines in terms of J. That does not change my opinion.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Random but interesting

permalink
report
reply
11 points

…don’t all nutritional labels do this? Is it not a legal requirement basically everywhere?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It doesn’t seem to be the case in the U.S. Basically everything I can find that has a nutritional information label exclusively lists “Calories” and I have never seen kJ here

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Pretty common in the Netherlands, often both kCal and kJ are printed on the product label

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Common all over the world.

permalink
report
reply

Mildly Interesting

!mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

Create post

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don’t spam.

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 567

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments